Originally Posted by
The Boz
The problem him and a picture of his Motor Home wouldn’t satisfy you.
A picture of a (Newell) motorhome would not have satisfied anyone, that is correct. Rob will be in an RV park later today he claims. He could take a picture of any motorhome and post it. Doesn't mean it is his. And he has done this with pictures of casino wins.
Now, documentation that he purchased the Newell motorhome, for 1.5 million as he claimed at the time that would have fit, just after his DU bug claim, would have been acceptable. It wouldn't have proven that is where the money came from, but the pieces would have fit and it would have been supporting evidence. That is what supporting evidence is.
I and others, including Alan, said we would have accepted that. In essence lowering the bar as much as we could for Rob and he still couldn't get over the bar.