Originally Posted by unowme View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Originally Posted by unowme View Post
I don't think there's a law to cover what they did.
I think there is a law and Alan quoted it.

5.  To place or increase a bet after acquiring knowledge of the outcome of the game or other event which is the subject of the bet, including past-posting and pressing bets.


N?
Ok. That's interesting. In the same section there another paragraph that might apply:

"7. To manipulate, with the intent to cheat, any component of a gaming device in a manner contrary to the designed and normal operational purpose for the component, including, but not limited to, varying the pull of the handle of a slot machine, with knowledge that the manipulation affects the outcome of the game or with knowledge of any event that affects the outcome of the game."

What's also interesting is these are the "2013 REVISED STATUTES". I wonder if these were written after the fact to address the double up bug.
If these were revised in 2013, then it doesn't apply to this case. let's assume it was revised because of this case.

But either way, I am not sure your #7 applied. The manipulation did not alter the outcome of the play or spin. It altered the payout and denomination.