Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Originally Posted by unowme View Post
I don't think there's a law to cover what they did.
I think there is a law and Alan quoted it.

5.  To place or increase a bet after acquiring knowledge of the outcome of the game or other event which is the subject of the bet, including past-posting and pressing bets.


This is exactly what they did, changed the bet amount (denomination) after the outcome of the game or event. Like I said, when people think of this they think of capping a table game bet with more chips. They did the same thing, just did so electronically.

Pennsylvania and other jurisdictions probably haven't been in the game long enough to know how to handle this. But if this had been taken to court here in Nevada and this #5 law cited, it would have been game over. Nevada knows how to protect their casino industry.

It would be interesting to hear Bob N's take on this. I wonder if he would have taken this case? Seems like I may have discussed this case with him briefly at one point, but I can't seem to remember. Must not have made an impression on me. Axelwolf or anyone else, have you ever discussed this with Bob N?
The key question here is when was this regulation added. Was it there in 2009?