Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
Stuff like this puzzles me. A guy goes from a loser to a winner after tons of research and then tries to help others FOR FREE, and another charges out the kazoo for advice, and guess who gets mocked most of the time?
Rob suggests that anyone who pays for Dancer's advice should be insured because said advice is faulty. All I'm suggesting is that if Rob's advice on how to play is better than Dancer's, then he (Rob) would offer a guarantee and/or similar insurance because he continually presents his own product as being foolproof. .. or is it just another case of Rob's mouth writing a check his a$$ can't cash?