I was very fortunate, as a young man before the internet, that I was interested in debunking the paranormal. At least 90% of all publications, books and professional journal articles alike regarding the paranormal, were pro paranormal. Therefore I had no choice but to read material with which I was in disagreement. I read much more with which I was in disagreement than that with which I agreed. This turned out to be helpful in terms of critical thinking and recognizing various strengths and weaknesses of evidence. It was also very helpful in evaluating the presenters of various arguments and their reasons for presenting x and excluding y to make their cases.
In any event, I wonder why mickey didn't also list this immediate debunking of the Risch piece, which was obviously available.
https://respectfulinsolence.com/2020...xychloroquine/