Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Have I ever validated any of Rob's silly claims? No. Have I examined them, interviewed him about his claims, and even challenged his claims about non-random machines? Yes.

Did I just question one of his strategies for playing 7/5 Bonus? Yes... and you even highlighted my post in your post above. And I would like to know Rob's response since, as I pointed out, his "strategy" applies to single line games and I wonder if he might change it for a 50-line machine? Is there some reason why you don't want Rob to respond? I look forward to reading his response. Wouldn't it be funny if he agreed with what I did because it was on a 50-line machine and not a single line machine?

If asking questions about Rob's system makes me "look tremendously stupid" as you seem to indicate above, then I will just have to be the dumbest jerk on the Internet for questioning Rob. Because asking questions is what I do, and have done for more than 40 years as a professional.

I resent your comments.

You seem to have confused "reporting on Rob Singer" with "endorsing Rob Singer."

Earlier in this particular thread I even questioned his breakdown of 95%-5% and even in live poker that ratio is always being debated though the skill part of the equation is highly favored over the luck part in live poker.

Don't dismiss the value of a win goal and a loss limit because they are very valuable despite what the "advantage players" claim. I recently had a very heated discussion with an "advantage player" who said win goals and loss limits were hogwash but then I learned that his daily bankroll for playing casino games was thirty dollars. That made me laugh. Now if he had a bankroll of three thousand dollars each day he might look at win goals and loss limits a bit differently.
That you resent my comments is tough luck. There's so much that goes on around here that is to be resented that's part of being active on this forum. Life's a bitch. You like to read into this thing in a different way than I intended but that's your issue, not mine.

I'll respond one more time with the same statement. This thread is just another twist to the same old story. Only in an attempt to keep discussion going. I'll guess someone is bored more than he likes to admit because if this all doesn't mean anything anymore, why keep going on about the same thing over and over and over again. The only thing that has changed is the gift wrapping. And you seem to enjoy it so by all means, continue!!

Now, where did I say I hoped Rob didn't reply? I said I was hoping the majority wouldn't step into this trap again to discuss the same old story so maybe we could all move on to more interesting things that don't involve Singer and Arci beating eachother up within 3 posts. Until now, that has only turned out to be wishful thinking.