Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
I probably shouldn’t have bothered answering because it will only come with you asking more rhetorical questions.
Relax, you're not obligated to answer any questions you can't handle.

Stipulating that both monet & Mdawg have been truthful in their "trip reports" for last week, then both members were playing -EV games.

Isn't it likely that MDawg's baccarat expectation was greater than monet's VP/reels/sports betting expectation?

We have monet winning almost $90K from a starting bankroll of $1100.

MDawg reports winnings of $57K with an unknown bankroll, but we can assume it's more than $1100...agreed?

If you read the reports, both players suffered wins and losses during the same period, and both ended up winning overall.

So, what is this reality that comes from playing with a small edge compared to playing at a disadvantage?

How does it apply in this case?