Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Mission, I knew you would jump in with you Shackleford ass kissing. Was just waiting for it.
Oh, you. I think it's actually kind of endearing that you confuse being more than zero objective about things with ass-kissing. If I were ass-kissing, I wouldn't have been on your side on the Norm thing.

Ownership of the site is a technicality. Mike RUNS the forum and thus provided the platform. If you don't believe me take note when my suspension that ends tomorrow, mysteriously turns into a ban or resignation. That won't be the serbs, they could care less. That will be Wizard, so don't hide behind that 'he doesn't own the forum' bullshit.
It's not a technicality. If you don't like what's going on, then there's nothing prohibiting you from PM'ing the owners or other Administration. You seem to want to pretend that one thing or another is some sort of scam, well, if it were, then don'y you think maybe PM'ing ownership would be more potentially effective than getting yourself banned and coming over here to petulantly post provoking pejoratives pointlessly?

Oh, so you're going to resign and then claim not to do have done so? Is that the play?

35 people? No. But there should have been more than just the 2 getting paid. That invites collusion. You want to invite the opposite, transparency. Should have been another couple people not getting paid and Axel would have been the perfect candidate, because he had a strong opinion. Imagine Axelwolf being convinced some of Mdawgs claims were true. That would have been something...a real feather in the cap.
Once again, MDawg and Wizard did not propose the terms; they just accepted them. You're barking up the wrong tree holding Wizard accountable for that.

I would have been a good candidate because I know a little about gambling and am completely neutral. But, the terms didn't say anything about a second witness.

And I am NOT crying after the fact. I and others, axelwolf included said from the very beginning, this proposal solves nothing about Mdawgs claims, and that was the goal. It would be like playing H-O-R-S-E to determine who the best basketball player in the world is. Ridiculous and anyone playing along, as you are now, is complicit in these bullshit claims.
Yeah, I know, that's why the whole thing was stupid and pointless. I remember saying that both before and after. I might have said it during, if only I knew what day and time the meetup happened. I also said that there's really no way MDawg doesn't come out with more credibility than before, as long as a meetup of any kind takes place, even if he were to lose the session.

Anyway, your claims of collusion are ridiculous and founded on nothing other than the fact that you despise Wizard too much to even have the slightest shred of objectivity.

In what way am I playing along? Some things you say are right, some are wrong...but per the usual Modus Operandi, you're going to act like a little bitch if I don't 100% agree with everything you're saying.