Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
Saying that you viewed a picture is proof of what? It's proof that you saw a picture, that's all. It's not proof that the picture is a true representation of anything.

Holding a check with the memo "winnings" is proof of what? It's not proof of net winnings or even gross winnings. There may be no winnings at all.

This is no different than photos of a Newell at a campground.
I should have added this before:

I don't think Mr Shackleford endorsed Mr Mdawg or even vouched for his claims. I think he just said what he observed and no more.

Mr Shackleford should not be called an enabler. I'd call him a good writer who presented an observation without any conclusion.

If someone paid Mr Shackleford thinking they were getting an endorsement, they should ask for their money back.

Mr Shackleford endorsed or supported nothing that Mr Mdawg has claimed.