Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
Mr Kewlj your vision is blinded by your own bias. You hate Mr Shackleford so much that you can't even give him credit for wisely sidestepping any endorsement of Mr Mdawg.
I don't hate Shackleford. I don't even know him. I do strongly disapprove of him providing a platform for this phony, bullshit crap, just as I disapproved of Dan Druff doing so here with Rob (during my time here) and you doing so before that, and just as I disapprove of Norm providing a platform for a guy making blackjack claims that weren't possible. Free speech or not, these forums are supposed to be somewhat tied to reality. They are all run by math guys, who know such claims aren't true and I do strongly disapprove of them allowing their forum to be used as a platform for claims that defy math. That is never going to change with me.

As far as credit for sidestepping? What kind of baloney is that? It was Shackleford's own proposal back in December that he should get to the bottom of this. Now I am supposed to say, good job in side-stepping and doing nothing? You are supposed to have a journalism background Alan and journalism is about getting to the truth. You are sending out praise for the opposite.....side stepping.