Sorry, monet. You're dealing with two problems with your analogies:
1) Sports aren't really coin flips. Betting Marciano or Tyson or Mayweather yielded streaks, is my point.
2) More importantly, it's one thing to pluck something out of history, like the A's or Lakers (33 in a row) streak AFTER THE FACT, and use that as an example of "streaks happen". You're taking extraordinary subsets out of all of the millions of outcomes and pointing to them without mentioning the tens of millions of times no streaks happened. This is textbook confirmation bias. It's something entirely different to start at Point A, as MDawg has done, and then two years later claim you won 40 in a row without reporters attending any of the games. In essence, we are supposed to buy into the idea that MDawg's reportage is the sum total of his gambling reality during that time.