Originally Posted by monet View Post
Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
MrAxelWolf I will stop posting here.

Mr Coach Belly was your question really serious? We're having a good laugh in the office.

Goodbye.
You have bad punctuation and grammar (or is it grammer? Wait a minute, that's Kelsey.) for the professional you claim to be.
And if you are Alan, that is even worse because of his career.
Either way, you lose.
1. You, I, and the rest of VCT were told not to bet parlays (quite odd advice given the butterfly effect on the parlay as a whole of shifting lines of individual games which make up the parlay - could swing massively in the players favor as easily as in the houses favor with the butterfly effect).
2. You, I, and the rest of VCT were told that if a medical study showing hydroxychloroquine (and perhaps azithromyacin) is effective against Covid is not peer reviewed then it offers no proof.
3. However if a study that is never published (and is therefore also not peer-reviewed like in point 2) above) shows no effect, one would think that also no conclusion should be drawn since, as in 2) above it is not peer-reviewed. And yet you, I, and rest of VCT were told that these non-peer-reviewed (and non-published) medical studies which show no efficacy substantiate that the regimen has no effect ?! I guess it depends on the agenda as to the validity of non-peer-reviewedness.