Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
What I enjoy about you Rob, is that every once in a while, in your desperation to attempt to discredit me or some other AP that you are jealous and bitter about, you post something as stupid as above, complete with the "I showed this post to my imaginary expert". You know your opinion is nothing so enter the imaginary expert. All that is missing is the imaginary expert posting here like "girlfriday" your imaginary real estate expert.

I don't even have to post anything debunking your ridiculous post because every AP, whether playing professionally or recreationally, whether blackjack player or not, knows what you just wrote is as silly and as real as your 1.5 million dollar Newell.

Don't have to expose someone who exposes themselves. You have done all the work for me.
You can pick up books like "Spy the Lie" and "Understanding Police Interrogation" on Amazon. One of the basic tenets of pinning down whether someone is telling the truth is the detail. If an interrogator is interested in where you've been a particular 12 hours during a crime, and you say you were driving 500 miles, the interrogator will try to pin down where you stopped for gas, what you ate, who you saw. How much you paid for the gas, how you paid for the gas, any toll roads, and so on. Then, if you answer, those details can be tracked down and verified.

"Singer" does a great job of, unfortunately in an obvious way, never actually providing details that are credible. Everything foggy and vanilla. Remember his account, posted on Mendelson's blog pages, explaining how he discovered the double up? The "Singer account" of the origin? When I read that, I rolled my eyes. No law enforcement professional would buy that account for a second

The point is, it's always an unnamed person. Whether it's his guarantees of getting a column again at Gaming Today, or anonymous management explaining card counting at the Peppermill, or the Hard Rock, or Suncoast, it's always some unnamed source telling him everything is exactly as he has declared in his posts. Only there's never a name or specific title attached.

Think back on his allegedly being accosted about the Newell as he ate dinner. Great story, but he couldn't quite actually describe the guy. He gives height -- LOL. But no description. No age, no hair color, no weight. Nothing. As usual, Rob's a fine witness. Good storyteller, but devoid of details. Details are what get you debunked.

And on it goes.