The Adventures of MDawg (in progress)

[wellbush]

English Note: The proper word would be "detractors," which is plural. So the proper spelling would be detractors' with the apostrophe after the plural.

Math Note: I'm always up for learning new math. Each year, I review "Probability Made Clear" from the Great Courses, featuring Michael Starbird of the University of Texas at Austin. I have no expertise in math, so I try to muddle through relying on courses like these and some of my friends, who have taught probability in college. If wellbush is up for it, he could lay out his math explanations here, perhaps in an entire section of threads devoted to the same. I, for one, would certainly enjoy learning new math concepts.

Additional math and English Note: "Countless" is one of those words best NOT used in discussing math. As in "countless verified wins at the casinos" suggests that the reader cannot count very high or that the MDawg is immortal and has racked up so many wins that mortals cannot count them. While MDawg has made many claims, I do not think that immortality is among them. Although one can make the case that the Crusades were a precursor to MDawg and his followers battling futilely to their deaths in support of the unprovable, I do not believe that MDawg, although a crusader of sorts, was a Crusader with a capital "C." If any 12th century paintings turn out to feature the Dawg, I stand corrected.

You're correct re detractors'. You're not necessarily correct re "countless" coz ("coz" is another english error, but who's being pedantic?) I was using the term in the sense of 'numerous.' I'll get back to you re EV.