Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
The only thing I'm latching onto are you actual posts. As far as Moses goes his math makes sense to me, so why don't you just prove it wrong? We were taught by you that the math never lies...
Ok, I will. Few non blackjack players like you know this, but in a normal off the top of shuffle blackjack game with a house edge of roughly .5%, a player will win 43% of hands, loses 49% and push 8% (roughly). So Even when the counts goes positive to say true count +4, playing with about a 2% advantage, those percentages only move slightly. The player will win just slightly more and most the difference is just slightly more blackjacks @ 150% payoff (will also fair slightly better with double downs, but the blackjack are the main thing). That is all it takes to flip the game from a slight casino advantage to slight player advantage.

So at no time will a player be winning more than 45% of rounds longterm. At NO advantage achievable from card counting. So for someone to say they win 60% of their max bets is...well bonkers. Simply not the way it works.