Let me see if I got this right. Blackhole is saying that APs blindly support each other. But then in the next breath he says that I sometimes disagree....even argue with what other APs say. Which is it? I think he just proved that I don't blindly agree with other APs.

Nothing wrong with a little disagreement. Blackhole is hoping he can drive a wedge in the hopes that some supporting me will stop. What he continues to miss is that they aren't supporting me with anything, just saying they find my claims credible based on math and how things work.