Originally Posted by
Alan Mendelson
Hence the reason your system cannot be proven, Rob. Important: Not proving it doesn't mean you didn't win the money. But not being able to prove it using simulations makes it difficult if not impossible to understand and believe in. So, you will always have the doubters and unfortunately there probably is no way to make them see it as you see it.
Frankly, how could you ever hope to convince Arc when he is so vocal about not following win goals and loss limits? It's hopeless.
Rob: change your method of operation and write a new book that's titled "I beat the casinos using a whacky system at video poker and won a million bucks." Then tell people the "whacky hands" you played (like busting three queens to hit a $100K royal) and how you change deomonimations (say you did it on a whim) and you'll be a folk hero.
Subtitle your book this way: I tried to play poker the "smart way" but I found out the "dumb way" worked better for me.
Yeah, that's the ticket.