Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
Once again you applied the forum tactic #2 "ignore" when you look like the fool you are and just want it to go away.

You've pulled this forum tactic at least 10 times already just with me. Lost count with how many others you did the same thing.

Now less than 12 hours later you respond to a different post I made above where you think you could justify your stupidity.
OMG, How stupid are you? Why do I have to repeat things 5 times with you like you are a 5 year old? Is it dementia?

Why does everyone know how the block feature works except you? When someone is blocked you see a notification that someone you have blocked posted and it asks if you would like to read that post. I told you last week that you were blocked, but I was unblocking your posts in this thread to see if I wanted to respond to further make you look foolish by answering your stupid charges with things I have said many times before. It has been kind of fun, making you look so dumb, but you are so stupid it is getting kind of tiring. Plus now, you are posting nothing even new. You just keep repeating the same stupid things already answered and proven false. Again.....demensia?

Originally Posted by blackhole View Post

Someone just said somewhere where everything you print about playing BJ is common knowledge for everyone to see today. Maybe 15 years ago when you read this shit it meant something different back then.

Your claims are all played out and have been exhausted.

You just keep adding additional made up fantasies to deal with the questions that come up dealing with today's casino preventive measures after the casinos gained 15 years of more experience after dealing with the same shit you read about. Nothing you say is confirmed for fact by any other alleged BJ forum experts where instead they add lots of doubt about your claims of what you say you're pulling off today. Do you ever wonder why you fight with everyone everywhere you post? AP's and non AP's? It's so obvious your bullshit is clearly you making it up as you go along being based on what you THINK MIGHT be true. Not confirmed facts.
What do you think has changed in the last 15 years as far as the cat and mouse game with card counters? Here is how detection works and basically has worked for the time I have been playing. The floor (pit) initiates an evaluation (at most casinos). So it all starts with the pit personnel. So your play has to alarm or raise issues for the pit personnel to take any action. That means for starters, it has to be outside whatever their comfort level or tolerance level is. That usually means betting limits or money won that session.

So a player sitting down playing $25 or $50 hand at a $25 or $50 minimum table, do you think that is outside their comfort level? Of course not. Everyone at the table is doing that. What about when the count starts to go positive (small advantage) and I bet say $100 at a $25 or $50 table? Do you think that is unusual? Do you think anyone is panicing 'OMG a guy is betting $100 at a $50 table?". I or anyone else can go back and forth between $25 minium and $100 until the cows come home with out raising an eye.

Even a little higher count and advantage....$200 bet. Is it unusual for a player to bet $200 at a $50 table? a $25 table? Not unusual, If a player has been losing it isn't that unusual to raise bet chasing loses. If a player is winning it isn't that unusual to parley up playing with winnings. The pit sees this hundred times a day from non counters. So even this level isn't a huge red flag. But this is the point they begin to take notice.

The next jump up to my max bet is the one that might raise some eyes, particularly when a player bets that amount and then retreats back to small wagers and then bets that amount later. That is the big tell. That is the point they start thinking about requesting an evaluation. Well I don't retreat back to small wager after betting that amount. So there is no tell. I exit, avoiding any action. Do you get this? None of this has changed in 15 years.

Now once an evaluation is requested is where there is some new technology. That is where there are computer programs to evaluate a players play and see if his bet increases are correlated with times of bigger advantages. But even that evaluation takes time, usually 20 minutes minimum depending on how fast hands are played. So even if evaluation is requested when I hit my max bet, I am gone before it is complete. It is an incomplete evaluation on an unrated player that is no longer playing. In other words, it is nothing. It is trash. It is NO evaluation.

So the other trigger is money won for that session. If a player sits there for 3, 4 hours winning 5, 6 thousand betting the limits described, that begins, to be a point they would request an evaluation. Again, my exit trigger guarantee I am playing a short session one way or another, avoiding and limiting those bigger wins for each session. Occasionally they occur, should I get to max bet for a a number of consecutive hands and win most of them, but even then, I am seconds away (shuffle point) from exiting at that point. I am probably gone about the time the pit guy is picking up the phone, certainly before any evaluation is complete. And an incompolete evaluation is what? say it with me...it is nothing. It is trash. Like it never happened.

So none of that has changed....not one iota. Any new technology like the computer program for evaluation requires surveillance person to run program. They aren't running it on every player at this level. That is what playing these levels mean. That is why I am not playing higher levels, although I have the bankroll.

So just stop with you "avoiding detection with all the advances" bullcrap. It just proves you know nothing about what you are talking about or how things work.

Now next lie you said is that lots of other AP's cast doubt on things I say. Show me where even one single blackjack AP has cast doubt on anything I say? 1 real blackjack AP? And if you are going to point to moses, don't bother. If anything moses plays single deck in Reno and I suspect at lower limits than he says. He has no idea about Las Vegas or what I do. That became crystal clear in the last week, with his "moving to Las vegasz" thread. Don't embarrass him or yourself by citing him as your expert witness.

This may be the last of my free seminars for you. It really is getting old now. and you will just come back with the exact same thing anyway, just like a demensia patiant.