Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
So, seeing that I have met your two conditions and I hope the arbitrator is still good, I expect you to accept my one condition that the IRS documents come directly from them to me. If you think I care in the least about wasting time talking to casinos about you or anybody else, that's extreme paranoia. Again, I live a real life and casinos are nothing but infrequent entertainment these days. I'll even review them with you and the arbitrator present. And BS with the redactions for my eyes. Do you worry about everything?

Edit: I feel like a school teacher. Kew, I don't usually log in and out unless we're traveling. I keep my computer on and that's likely why you think I'm on when I'm not. The bigger question is, who bothers with looking at that stuff anyway? Oh...someone with no life.
Your explanation of remaining logged on doesn't really fly as late evening you were logged in and out several different times. Even if you went out to dinner, how long does a meal at Denny's take? If you were really serious about setting something up involving a 6 figure wager, you could have gotten back in the alloted time frame.

But that aside, your proposal this morning has not a damn thing new in it. Terms that I have already rejected, mainly that you will have any access to my personal information. I don't know how I can be any clearer on the matter, I would not have agree to any terms that give you access to my personal information.

However late last night, I received an email from an attorney friend. When I say "friend" I have paid for his services a couple times and had lunch and dinner with him a couple times. Sometimes I just like to have a meal with him and pick his brain. But I consider him a friend. Maybe I am being liberal with the term. I suspect many know who I am referring to.

I am not sure how he came to learn of this wager/proposal. Probably a fellow AP alerted him, because I don't think he reads THIS forum. So anyway, I have been advised that the whole proposal involving the bet or financial arrangement is problematic, because such a bet is illegal. That means, no agreement with any person or company holding escrow could be enforced. No contract with an arbitrator, say Dan Druff or anyone else chosen could be enforced. I am advised this kind of wager/finacial agreement would almost certainly end in some sort of litigation, and there can be no litigation because it is an illegal wager.

That basically removes the finacial incentive, which without I have no interest in. Without the finacial incentive offering protection against loss of income due to my identity being revealed, you are asking me to do an "arci"...to show my taxes to prove to something to some trolls on an anonymous internet forum. I have never had an interest in that and still have zero interest in that.

Unless you can come up with something worthwhile to me, not a wager, but some sort of financial incentive to cover possible losses, I have no further interest in your games.