Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

Haleluju!!! Only took me stating it a dozen time for you to understand.


Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
there is no reason in the world why he would not throw every penny he has at this plus solicit cash from as many people as it takes to have accepted my original "significant" (again, his word) bet amount, if he supposedly knows he will win. It make no sense that he wouldn't do that.
There is a reason actually and I hinted to it. I didn't want to spell it out because I didn't want to offend anyone that might be involved as an arbitrator. The single word explanation is 'collusion'. What is stopping either party, you or I with colluding with the arbitrator and splitting the proceeds should he rule in our favor? That is a scenario that I could lose, while knowing that I have actually won. And thus I weighed what I was willing to risk.

But again, moot point at the moment.
All you're showing here is more paranoia nonsense muddying up what should be an otherwise very simple endeavor. And why all the obfuscating? Because you know your collar does not match your cuffs.
If what he has said comes close to matching up (let's say within a 15% margin ) would you not agree that for the most part what he has been saying regarding what he makes per year is credible? Yes or no?

Someome reread what MR.V said... Something like that seem like it would solve any tomfoolery issues. For that amount of money, I would also request that JK somehow shows proof that it's actually his documents and him.


Whatever the case, this is all moot because we have a one-sided situation. If KJ can't prove it, he won't make the bet, he would only be willing to make the bet if he is 100% certain he could prove it, and you would never take him up on the bet if he did in fact agreed to it, since you know that's the case as well. So it seems now the only place to go is for one of you to make up one or more conditions that you know the other person won't accept.