Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 68

Thread: Attempted doxxing

  1. #41
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

    Yes the bankruptcy was Mickey, but if I am not mistaken the judgement from the eviction came down during the period that Singer claims to have been making big money from gambling. And since the judgement was only for a relatively small amount, I forget exactly but less than $1000, wouldn't any normal person with the money that Singer is claiming at that time from gambling, have paid that judgement and avoided having the judgement and evicted on the record? Sometimes you just have to look at these things through the lens of common sense and say, "yeah, that story doesn't make sense".

    Anyway, I don't want to rehash Singer. I am very satisfied that he has been thoroughly debunked and no one is believing him anymore so he can't really harm anyone. Essentially, he has been neutered. He just hasn't realized it yet.

    The two funniest things about the Newell story:

    1) Rob claimed to have had a Newell for years, but never a photo of him and Newell or his family and Newell and so on. We were treated to photos of old CB equipment, and some handguns, of course, but no Newell pics.

    2) When he took out the RV trader ad, he did it for some ridiculously short time, like three days or something. So I looked up the ad pricing for that issue, and he had bought the absolute bottom barrel three-day special or some such...allegedly to sell the Newell! Was there even a pic in the ad? I don't remember, but whatever he bought was the absolute lowest end, shortest run ad. It was so obvious and bad, it did come across as him spoofing himself, in a sense.
    Breaker, breaker one nine. The Newell was irrelevant, pretty much just another Singer deflection, until he himself made it relevant, after the Shackleford interview last year when both Shackleford and Dan Druff pressured Rob to show some kind of evidence relating to his double up bug claim. What Rob came up with was that he had spent the money on this fantasy Newell. He did that. He tied it to the claim!

    So that left him to try to come up with something anything to support the fantasy Newell. First it was the phony bill of sale with no company logo or letterhead. Like a company selling ,million dollar RV's doesn't have bill of sales with their name on it. Second hilarious thing about the bill of sale, was all 3 signatures buyers and dealership salesman were in the same handwriting. STRIKE 1

    When that fell through next up was the pictures in the dealership showroom fiasco. STRIKE 2 Funniest thing about that fiasco is the very latest development where Rob just last month, admits the pictures in the RV was not his RV, but says it was identical to his. If you actually own that RV, why would you go to the dealership to take pictures in a similar RV?

    The ad was placed to support #2. But as redietz points out. Rob sprung for the minimum ad, minimum days, minimum pictures and then showed only 2 pictures that we had already seen and HE NOW ADMITS WEREN'T HIS RV. So we are to believe he placed pictures of an RV for sale that were not the actual RV but "similar" to the RV? We say this all the time, but seriously....You can't make this shit up!
    Are you a handwriting expert? Show the bill of sale so we can compare signatures. Your word about it is no good. You always twist your "facts" up. Do you seriously think that someone trying to fool people would make all three signatures the same? Not likely.
    Challenge to redietz. We bet every NFL regular season game. You make the picks. If you lay the fav I get 2 extra points. If you take the dog I get a 2 point discount. Easy pickings for you.

  2. #42
    When I pointed out that Singer told us the sequence of events for the double up bug that was published in the newspaper article was wrong, KJ scrambled to contact the author. Now you know KJ thought he was going to come up with evidence Rob was lying. But it backfired. The author told KJ he intentionally put the wrong sequence in the article.

    That devasted KJ. So he went to another theory; someone else had to have taught Rob the sequence. I put up a 1K reward. Its been what? Two years? Singer even published the strategy. The Wizard's interview of Singer garnered publicity throughout the AP world. No one has come forward with evidence they taught Singer anything. TWO FUCKING YEARS!! No one else but Singer ever put up what they called the correct sequence. No one ever said Singer's published sequence was wrong.

    So we still have the question. If Singer didn't figure it out on his own then who the hell taught it to him? The money is burning a whole in my pocket. Some and get it. Anyone.

    KJ, you haven't debunked a fucking thing.
    Challenge to redietz. We bet every NFL regular season game. You make the picks. If you lay the fav I get 2 extra points. If you take the dog I get a 2 point discount. Easy pickings for you.

  3. #43
    The DU bug never existed. It was an excuse the perps used.

  4. #44
    You can't prove a negative Mickey. If there is proof to be shown, it has to come from Rob.

    Personally I don't require that he (or anyone) show proof. But Wizard and Dan Druff did ask for proof and the "proof" Rob came up with was tying the double up to the Newell, which he then quite clearly attempted to show phony proof of....twice (at least).

    No one forced him....he did that on his own. So yes, there IS definitive proof against.

  5. #45
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    The DU bug never existed. It was an excuse the perps used.
    An excuse for what?
    Challenge to redietz. We bet every NFL regular season game. You make the picks. If you lay the fav I get 2 extra points. If you take the dog I get a 2 point discount. Easy pickings for you.

  6. #46
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The bankruptcy was long before the progressive system, like 5 years before. For 20 years Singer has said he lost 250K over a 4 year period before using the progressive system starting about 1999.
    Yes the bankruptcy was Mickey, but if I am not mistaken the judgement from the eviction came down during the period that Singer claims to have been making big money from gambling. And since the judgement was only for a relatively small amount, I forget exactly but less than $1000, wouldn't any normal person with the money that Singer is claiming at that time from gambling, have paid that judgement and avoided having the judgement and evicted on the record? Sometimes you just have to look at these things through the lens of common sense and say, "yeah, that story doesn't make sense".

    Anyway, I don't want to rehash Singer. I am very satisfied that he has been thoroughly debunked and no one is believing him anymore so he can't really harm anyone. Essentially, he has been neutered. He just hasn't realized it yet.
    When was Singer debunked? You and maxpen certainly didn't debunk anything. The only thing the two of you have is conjecture. Put up some proof.
    Singer debunked himself. You must have the same mental illness as the president. Singer even recently admitted that the Newell he posed in was not his. Meanwhile he stated differently to you multiple times. Yet you're still riding the full 9............

    Name:  retards-retards-everywhere-sdnv27.jpg
Views: 507
Size:  28.0 KB

  7. #47
    I can understand not having proof of the Double up bug.

    If someone was out to show proof they owned somthing, it makes no sense they wouldn't just do so without a bunch of BS. There would be many photos that were taken with somthing like that, or one would be able to take a video of them driving it or whatever. <<<<Come on guys, that's just obvious.

    If I say I owned a sports car, RV, house, etc there is zero chance I wouldn't be able to prove it well beyond a reasonable doubt.

  8. #48
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    You can't prove a negative Mickey. If there is proof to be shown, it has to come from Rob.

    Personally I don't require that he (or anyone) show proof. But Wizard and Dan Druff did ask for proof and the "proof" Rob came up with was tying the double up to the Newell, which he then quite clearly attempted to show phony proof of....twice (at least).

    No one forced him....he did that on his own. So yes, there IS definitive proof against.
    You can't prove a negative? Then why do you continually claim you debunked the DU bug issue?

    If there is definitive proof that Singer didn't work the DU bug then please put that evidence up. You can't hide behind "I say there was definitive evidence so that means there is definitive evidence." Put the fucking evidence up.

    There are plenty of things I did in my AP career that I can't prove now.

    But why would someone, doing something that was clearly in a grey area as far as legality goes, collect and keep evidence for years, that would tie him to the DU bug?

    Quit mixing the DU bug issue with the Newell issue. When it comes to proof they are two separate issues.

    Quit dodging the issue of how Singer knew the published sequence was wrong. Try concentrating on that one issue. See what you can come up with. But please. Don't give us the stupid fucking conjecture. Give us some fucking facts.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 10-15-2021 at 04:18 AM.
    Challenge to redietz. We bet every NFL regular season game. You make the picks. If you lay the fav I get 2 extra points. If you take the dog I get a 2 point discount. Easy pickings for you.

  9. #49
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    I can understand not having proof of the Double up bug.

    If someone was out to show proof they owned somthing, it makes no sense they wouldn't just do so without a bunch of BS. There would be many photos that were taken with somthing like that, or one would be able to take a video of them driving it or whatever. <<<<Come on guys, that's just obvious.

    If I say I owned a sports car, RV, house, etc there is zero chance I wouldn't be able to prove it well beyond a reasonable doubt.
    Axel, you're missing the point. If someone doesn't want it to be that someone they dislike has, had, or did something, then no picture of anything will ever be accepted as any type of "proof". You've seen it--when someone who has an online friendly agenda with other posters comes along with any kind of claim, controversial or not, there's this effort made to comment about it as if it were absolutely true. No questions asked.

    In my case with our Newell, for a few, accepting it would be troublesome to them in that I tied that purchase to my 5-1/2 years of profiting off the DU play--even though we could have bought one with our retirement account, which would have been unwise given what money sinkholes those things are for normal people. Yes I admitted that the interior pics I posted were not from mine but I did it because it was very similar to our interior scheme, and the RV was very close to our home while ours was stored 50 miles away. I had no idea there were already pics on a used RV for sale site. Naturally critics did what they do. So when they vowed to come over to see it when I put it up for sale, they cowered so they would not have to face the music, and so they could safely continue to lie about it. They did not really want the actual proof. It is not the ending critics could deal with.

    As for how I treat other aspects of what we've had or have over the years, we choose to do things differently that cliques of gamblers or "online posting buddies" see as normal. We have a close-knit, trusting family and I chose to take complete advantage of that in order that our passing, when it comes, is as easy on our family as possible. I learned much of what I do in that regard from some very savvy people who I traveled the world with. I also learned how to bug the hell out of people like kew, which has never stopped paying dividends.

    Pictures as supposed proof is in the eye of the beholder.

  10. #50
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    You can't prove a negative Mickey. If there is proof to be shown, it has to come from Rob.

    Personally I don't require that he (or anyone) show proof. But Wizard and Dan Druff did ask for proof and the "proof" Rob came up with was tying the double up to the Newell, which he then quite clearly attempted to show phony proof of....twice (at least).

    No one forced him....he did that on his own. So yes, there IS definitive proof against.
    You can't prove a negative? Then why do you continually claim you debunked the DU bug issue?

    If there is definitive proof that Singer didn't work the DU bug then please put that evidence up. You can't hide behind "I say there was definitive evidence so that means there is definitive evidence." Put the fucking evidence up.

    There are plenty of things I did in my AP career that I can't prove now.

    But why would someone, doing something that was clearly in a grey area as far as legality goes, collect and keep evidence for years, that would tie him to the DU bug?

    And quit mixing the DU bug issue with the Newell issue. When it comes to proof they are two separate issues. It was obvious Singer was fucking with you guys when he put up the pics of the newell. I even said so several times. It was hilarious how you guys took that bait and wasted copious amounts of your life's time, burning the midnight oil while Singer slept peacefully, trying to debunk it.

    Quit dodging the issue of how Singer knew the published sequence was wrong. Try concentrating on that one issue. See what you can come up with. But please. Don't give us the stupid fucking conjecture. Give us some fucking facts.
    On the last para: kew will never be able to explain that because I'm the only person who knew the explained sequence was wrong since I played it. And he just does not ever want that to be. You understand that (and there are a few others here who've told me they also do).

    But it is what it is. It bothers the shit out of kew. I find that neither here nor there.

  11. #51
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

    Yes the bankruptcy was Mickey, but if I am not mistaken the judgement from the eviction came down during the period that Singer claims to have been making big money from gambling. And since the judgement was only for a relatively small amount, I forget exactly but less than $1000, wouldn't any normal person with the money that Singer is claiming at that time from gambling, have paid that judgement and avoided having the judgement and evicted on the record? Sometimes you just have to look at these things through the lens of common sense and say, "yeah, that story doesn't make sense".

    Anyway, I don't want to rehash Singer. I am very satisfied that he has been thoroughly debunked and no one is believing him anymore so he can't really harm anyone. Essentially, he has been neutered. He just hasn't realized it yet.
    When was Singer debunked? You and maxpen certainly didn't debunk anything. The only thing the two of you have is conjecture. Put up some proof.
    Singer debunked himself. You must have the same mental illness as the president. Singer even recently admitted that the Newell he posed in was not his. Meanwhile he stated differently to you multiple times. Yet you're still riding the full 9............

    Name:  retards-retards-everywhere-sdnv27.jpg
Views: 507
Size:  28.0 KB
    So you took KJ's cock out of your mouth long enough to make a comment.
    Challenge to redietz. We bet every NFL regular season game. You make the picks. If you lay the fav I get 2 extra points. If you take the dog I get a 2 point discount. Easy pickings for you.

  12. #52
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    When was Singer debunked? You and maxpen certainly didn't debunk anything. The only thing the two of you have is conjecture. Put up some proof.
    Singer debunked himself. You must have the same mental illness as the president. Singer even recently admitted that the Newell he posed in was not his. Meanwhile he stated differently to you multiple times. Yet you're still riding the full 9............

    Name:  retards-retards-everywhere-sdnv27.jpg
Views: 507
Size:  28.0 KB
    So you took KJ's cock out of your mouth long enough to make a comment.
    LOL. So Rob's in a "close-knit, trusting family" that he previously said he never told about the DU bug. He just went bopping around, never revealing to them what he was doing? That's pretty goddamn funny. Close-knit and trusting, eh? Except regarding money, I suppose.

    Next, on cue, Rob will explain that he was "spoofing" by saying that his family, a la Sergeant Schulz, "knew not'ing, nooottttt'ing!" I wonder what his kids would say if they got called on the carpet by, say, a Native American tribe looking for restitution. Gotta watch that these days. No statute of limitations with the tribes, and the law tends to favor them these days. So if there's any records of Rob popping the occasional tribal casino for a few bucks, restitution could be on the legal table. Rob, of course, will say he never gambled at tribal casinos, except when he did, of course.

    Mickey, c'mon, man, whether Rob did the DU or not, who in their right mind who knew anything about the DU bug is going to say they "told Rob" for 2K? I mean, really? I sure as hell wouldn't do it. I don't think anybody posting here would do it. Would you do it? So if somebody did say they "told Rob" because they are destitute and need 2K, and Rob says they did not, would you pay them? Why would you take Rob's word over theirs'?

    I'm curious as to what you'd do.

    In case anyone is wondering why I wouldn't squeal for 2K, I think there's a good chance the bug was planted, which means somebody with long-term loyalties was positioned to do so at the programming origin point. Most of the time when people are positioned long term like that, they are beholden to various and sundry. And those various and sundry own your ass. Upsetting people who own your ass for 2K is beyond idiotic unless you're terminal. When you are told to not tell anyone, you best not tell anyone.

    And I'm not dismissing the "DU as cover story" idea jbjb presented. That actually makes a lot of sense in an Ockhams' Razor way. If you look at things from that perspective, it simplifies the logic of what the dudes did.


    I hope Rob did do the DU bug, because to have done that, and wind up where he is, in my mind, that took some real degenerative work.
    Last edited by redietz; 10-15-2021 at 06:11 AM.

  13. #53
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The bankruptcy was long before the progressive system, like 5 years before. For 20 years Singer has said he lost 250K over a 4 year period before using the progressive system starting about 1999.

    You framed the timing as a question here. But you have a habit of starting out with a speculation then later stating it as a fact.

    You haven’t proven anything about Singer. All you have is conjectures that you always start calling facts at some point.
    Man Servant up to bat again.....lol

    Crawling out of his safe space to perform his duties...RIP
    Maxpunk is back to suck KJ's cock again. Slurp! Slurp! Slurp! KJ says maxpunk is a damn good cocksucker.

    Now, I'm known for my unbiased opinions. So I have a compliment for you too, maxpuke. You are as good a flunky as has ever worked on a slot team.
    Repeatedly telling people your opinions are unbiased doesn’t make you known for unbiased opinions.

  14. #54
    Originally Posted by mcap View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post

    Man Servant up to bat again.....lol

    Crawling out of his safe space to perform his duties...RIP
    Maxpunk is back to suck KJ's cock again. Slurp! Slurp! Slurp! KJ says maxpunk is a damn good cocksucker.

    Now, I'm known for my unbiased opinions. So I have a compliment for you too, maxpuke. You are as good a flunky as has ever worked on a slot team.
    Repeatedly telling people your opinions are unbiased doesn’t make you known for unbiased opinions.
    He has made himself a recognized fool over Singer....... RIP

  15. #55
    I don't want to rehash the whole Singer DU Bug claim AGAIN and luckily I don't have time as I am heading out of town for a few days. Two things I am going to say and that will be it.

    1.) the fact that Singer knew the sequence 10 years later, 7 years after the story broke proves NOTHING. It is not proof that he knew the sequence back in 2005-2009. There are numerous ways he could have found out that information after the fact. Everything from someone that knew telling him to getting his hands on a machine or finding a machine out in a remote location that had not been fixed. If someone found a machine, were looking for that sequence, after the fact, it wouldn't take much playing around to figure it out.

    2.) I don't have time to find it now and am not going to look later but on this very forum when the story broke in 2013, Singer's first response was that what Kane/Nester did was illegal and cheating. He used those words. Now don't give me any crap about an attempt to deflect. The fact is that if he had found and made this play and been charged at any point later, his first defense would be that he didn't know it was illegal. So for him to say publicly that he thought it was illegal and cheating doesn't fly.

    Sometimes you just have to accept common sense and common sense tells me this is a guy with so many ever changing stories and this is one.

    Again the Newell, an unrelated tall tale for many years becomes relevant because when pressured by 2 forum administrators for proof last year, Singer tied the Newell to the double up claim as his proof. He then had to prove the Newell existed which he failed at epically. And anyone that wants to ignore or separate that is ignoring or trying to change history and reality.

  16. #56
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I don't want to rehash the whole Singer DU Bug claim AGAIN and luckily I don't have time as I am heading out of town for a few days. Two things I am going to say and that will be it.

    1.) the fact that Singer knew the sequence 10 years later, 7 years after the story broke proves NOTHING. It is not proof that he knew the sequence back in 2005-2009. There are numerous ways he could have found out that information after the fact. Everything from someone that knew telling him to getting his hands on a machine or finding a machine out in a remote location that had not been fixed. If someone found a machine, were looking for that sequence, after the fact, it wouldn't take much playing around to figure it out.

    2.) I don't have time to find it now and am not going to look later but on this very forum when the story broke in 2013, Singer's first response was that what Kane/Nester did was illegal and cheating. He used those words. Now don't give me any crap about an attempt to deflect. The fact is that if he had found and made this play and been charged at any point later, his first defense would be that he didn't know it was illegal. So for him to say publicly that he thought it was illegal and cheating doesn't fly.

    Sometimes you just have to accept common sense and common sense tells me this is a guy with so many ever changing stories and this is one.

    Again the Newell, an unrelated tall tale for many years becomes relevant because when pressured by 2 forum administrators for proof last year, Singer tied the Newell to the double up claim as his proof. He then had to prove the Newell existed which he failed at epically. And anyone that wants to ignore or separate that is ignoring or trying to change history and reality.
    I haven't yet known anyone that can 100% confirm the sequence. The person I believe to know what he is talking about hasn't actually gone through the sequence on a bugged machine. Someone on WOV claimed to have a bugged machine but they said some nonsense about only wanting to do it on a Royal Flush payout .

  17. #57
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post

    Singer debunked himself. You must have the same mental illness as the president. Singer even recently admitted that the Newell he posed in was not his. Meanwhile he stated differently to you multiple times. Yet you're still riding the full 9............

    Name:  retards-retards-everywhere-sdnv27.jpg
Views: 507
Size:  28.0 KB
    So you took KJ's cock out of your mouth long enough to make a comment.
    LOL. So Rob's in a "close-knit, trusting family" that he previously said he never told about the DU bug. He just went bopping around, never revealing to them what he was doing? That's pretty goddamn funny. Close-knit and trusting, eh? Except regarding money, I suppose.
    I have known a few AP's that never really discussed their AP plays with their families or involved them in any way.

  18. #58
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    So you took KJ's cock out of your mouth long enough to make a comment.
    LOL. So Rob's in a "close-knit, trusting family" that he previously said he never told about the DU bug. He just went bopping around, never revealing to them what he was doing? That's pretty goddamn funny. Close-knit and trusting, eh? Except regarding money, I suppose.
    I have known a few AP's that never really discussed their AP plays with their families or involved them in any way.

    So they were "close knit and trusting" except when it came to what they did for money. That's exactly what I'm poking fun at. Like bank robbers and hit men.

    "Oh, we were a close knit and trusting family, except of course I do stuff eight hours a day that you know nothing about because....?"

  19. #59
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post

    LOL. So Rob's in a "close-knit, trusting family" that he previously said he never told about the DU bug. He just went bopping around, never revealing to them what he was doing? That's pretty goddamn funny. Close-knit and trusting, eh? Except regarding money, I suppose.
    I have known a few AP's that never really discussed their AP plays with their families or involved them in any way.

    So they were "close knit and trusting" except when it came to what they did for money. That's exactly what I'm poking fun at. Like bank robbers and hit men.

    "Oh, we were a close knit and trusting family, except of course I do stuff eight hours a day that you know nothing about because....?"
    What an idiot...and it precisely explains why your supposed ex wife was so happy to be rid of you in any possible way.

  20. #60
    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I don't want to rehash the whole Singer DU Bug claim AGAIN and luckily I don't have time as I am heading out of town for a few days. Two things I am going to say and that will be it.

    1.) the fact that Singer knew the sequence 10 years later, 7 years after the story broke proves NOTHING. It is not proof that he knew the sequence back in 2005-2009. There are numerous ways he could have found out that information after the fact. Everything from someone that knew telling him to getting his hands on a machine or finding a machine out in a remote location that had not been fixed. If someone found a machine, were looking for that sequence, after the fact, it wouldn't take much playing around to figure it out.

    2.) I don't have time to find it now and am not going to look later but on this very forum when the story broke in 2013, Singer's first response was that what Kane/Nester did was illegal and cheating. He used those words. Now don't give me any crap about an attempt to deflect. The fact is that if he had found and made this play and been charged at any point later, his first defense would be that he didn't know it was illegal. So for him to say publicly that he thought it was illegal and cheating doesn't fly.

    Sometimes you just have to accept common sense and common sense tells me this is a guy with so many ever changing stories and this is one.

    Again the Newell, an unrelated tall tale for many years becomes relevant because when pressured by 2 forum administrators for proof last year, Singer tied the Newell to the double up claim as his proof. He then had to prove the Newell existed which he failed at epically. And anyone that wants to ignore or separate that is ignoring or trying to change history and reality.
    I haven't yet known anyone that can 100% confirm the sequence. The person I believe to know what he is talking about hasn't actually gone through the sequence on a bugged machine. Someone on WOV claimed to have a bugged machine but they said some nonsense about only wanting to do it on a Royal Flush payout .
    And this explains even more. Has anyone else ever identified that the DU play worked on ANY winning hand and not just on hand pays?

    Kew surely wouldn't want to comprehend that and it's understandable why. In fact, if he knew everything about my past he would kill himself on the spot. Which is making me think.....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Reminder regaring doxxing and link spamming
    By Dan Druff in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 117
    Last Post: 04-15-2020, 01:41 AM
  2. DOXXING THREATS
    By blackhole in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-10-2020, 12:57 PM
  3. Doxxing threat
    By DoxingAlert in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: 03-04-2020, 07:47 PM
  4. Attempted Contribution - Fever Aces
    By tableplay in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-04-2018, 09:59 AM
  5. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-03-2017, 02:43 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •