The REAL adventures of....

[redietz]

Exactly mickeycrimm!

Did you see he has claimed to win $151,000 the last two days playing double deck blackjack with this monster spread? Anyone that knows anything about Las Vegas blackjack and particularly double deck, which has earned the nickname "card counter trap" knows what bullshit this is.

And I saved the best for last. The name of this magical, mystical casino in Las Vegas is Cosmopolitan, which in reality (which this isn't) is one of the sweatiest casino's in Las Vegas and most dangerous because they are a big contributor to the databases.

To anyone that knows, there is not a single thing among any of this guys claims that rings anything close to true. It is all make believe.

My first thought was even ZenKing wouldn’t complain if he could play this way…..maybe

But seriously KJ or other BJ players, have you considered the math on what an experienced counters edge would be under these spreads, if tolerated?

What it appears MD is doing her is now saying he is working with an advantage based on the game he claims to be playing. Obviously it’s a game that isn’t available to anyone else in Vegas, or elsewhere. But he doesn’t have to nuisance of trying to explain he is winning at a -EV game like he did with Baccarat.

It’s actually a smart move on his part to fuck with everyone because in his mind the only way to prove him wrong is to go out and get yourself put in a database.

A fair Wizard would comment on the possibility of any casino letting a player spread like this at these (or any) limits and calculate the players edge.

Has anyone asked the Wizard about this?

I can't wait to hear the replies -- "well, normal little people of course can't spread like this, and the player advantage would be x with a 1 to 100 spread. But of course MDawg says he can spread like this. Don't call him a liar, and I signed an NDA."

Why don't you ask Shackleford what the terms and conditions of the NDA were. Is he allowed to personally comment on ANY likelihood involving MDawg's gambling? Because if the answer is no, you have a permanent pro-MDawg scam in place.

Now normally, I stick to the first and common definition of "scam," which does not necessarily include anything to do with money. That first definition is "a dishonest scheme; a fraud."

But if money changed hands because of the NDA (and why else would anyone sign an NDA?), then all definitions of "scam" come into play.

Whether money changed hands or not due to an NDA, if Shackleford refuses to comment clearly in his own voice on any MDawg gambling probabilities, then this is a scam. It's pretty clearly a scam. The NDA could be a ploy to just give MDawg carte blanche. Possibly a made-up excuse.

That's what it looks like to any reasonable person.