I find this all fascinating. The way I take it, Singer is upset because every time somebody asked me if I bought kewlJ's story, I said "I don't know whether he's a professional blackjack player, a short order cook, or working brothels in Pahrump, but...." and then I'd argue that whatever he had just said made sense math-wise and logically. Now if you go back and check what I said I knew or suspected about him, all I argued was the gambling.

And, in fact, when kewlJ reported any series of life events, whether marriage or covid or deaths, I never said much of anything, even though it was borderline rude to not say something.

I mean, go ahead and check any of my posts (I suspect belly keeps pretty good tabs on this stuff).

So now, because I'm one of the folks who isn't taken aback by Victor/Victoria trickeration reporting, I'm guilty of...what? Not buying the whole storyline for years despite defending the gambling stuff? That is wrong because why? All that matters to me is the gambling reporting, and that seems believable, realistic, and sound from both a math and logic perspective.

Go ahead and criticize me for not buying much of the overall storyline; I'm cynical like that. Disinterested, too.

I still don't know if kewlJ is a professional blackjack player, a short order cook, or working brothels in Pahrump, but he knows about Las Vegas gambling and he knows the math of gambling. Now he implies that he's not gay, and he used the word faggot. So I make what of that? Not much.

For all you folks who committed to "knowing kewlJ," well, good luck with that. And for Singer, you do realize, there's about a 98% chance kewlJ is a professional blackjack player, so after he retires, he's going to be able to post all of the details regarding a gambling life that didn't feature Newell stories and telepathing video poker machines. And he'll have, dare I say it, tax returns to prove it.