Re: Redietz

I don't have a problem with Redietz' position whatsoever, so all due apologies if I said anything that might imply that I do. As I have maintained in the past, everything that KewlJ has said vis-a-vis the math has been remarkably consistent over a very long period of time, but if KewlJ is to be believed now, lying in a way that remains remarkably consistent...even about matters that are of no consequence...is not outside of what he is perfectly happy to do on the forums, so who the hell knows?

Anyway, I do not see where Redietz has done or said anything wrong. Taken alone, the math behind KewlJ's claims remains supportable.