Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
I don't know how these pile of sports handicappers behave all-around when it comes to their "picks". But it's one thing to perpetually toot your own horn about decades-past performances from obscure contests etc., and quite another to put up some pre-game picks with an explanation or two. The only one I've seen, which was either by mistakenly talking out of turn, or was done with a purpose and a whole lotta prayers, was his touting of Cincinnati to "win it all" in NCAA football. Poof.

Why am I the only one of maybe TWELVE people to get solicited by redeitz' sports punks? Well guess what--he didn't expect to get excoriated for that nonsense that quickly, so he had his team pull back the reins like any wounded businessman would do.

It also makes no sense that he wouldn't accept my amateur vs. pro 32-game NFL challenge that had no money or conditions involved other than he pick the source of the lines for both of us. How much simpler could it have been anyway?

Agree with the poster who called touts who sell picks as the scum of the earth, who need other people's money because they lose their picks. After all, if their for-sale picks are such "locks", then why not just bet MORE on them instead of selling them?
I wanted to re-visit this post, because it's the kind of post from Rob that got me saying I was a sports handicapper in the first place. Rob thinking that the Bearcats at 150-1 was a bad play or losing play is so bizarre that it's mind blowing.
You want to revisit this post because its veracity keeps you up at night.

All of your dancing around in this thread doesn't change the truth that sports handicappers would be able to profit far more by betting more on their "picks" and "sure-thing locks" than by taking other people's money...if their picks were worth a shit. People sell stuff to make a living. Some do it with honor; these people don't.

Keep bringing up the same BS about your so-called emails or phone calls or texts, I'll unfortunately keep reminding you that the sleazebags who contacted me said they worked with/for you as soon as they believed I was interested in buying picks. I basically forced them into admitting how they got my phone numbers (which I posted here back then for some reason).

Saying Cincinnati was a "good bet" that lost is just plain stupid. There's only one good bet--one that WINS. Exactly how many suckers are going to buy picks from touts that blab about picking a loser. Speaking of which---a simple 32 NFL picks here with me, win, lose or draw, isn't gonna mean dick for your "reputation". Try again.