Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Mickey will love me for this, but for those following my blog's "Propaganda Files" entries, especially this last week, I appear to have gotten almost everything correct on multiple fronts. Either I'm prescient, or professional gamblers have a nose for the news.

First, I will post the links to recent blog entries. Then, I will post a link to the NYTimes story coming out today regarding CDC data.


https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...ation-and.html

https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...d-tactics.html

https://theskepticalgambler.blogspot...-two-what.html


Here's the NYTimes report:

https://news.yahoo.com/cdc-isnt-publ...124915536.html
How did your advocacy of a long lockdown square with the Johns Hopkins study?


If you'll notice, the Johns Hopkins study conclusions had to do with just the U.S. and western Europe, which is not the majority of the planet. And lockdowns did reduce deaths in Europe and the U.S. I suppose the calculus is they didn't prevent enough deaths in the U.S. and Europe to make them "worthwhile."
Did the lockdowns prevent deaths or just postpone them until the lockdowns end?