Originally Posted by
accountinquestion
In reference to the timeframe, I believe Mickey's take on things because I find him to be very truthful in what he says and if he would happen to be wrong it is very unlikely to be intentional.
You on the other hand are not that believable but are like 10x the Singer historian.
I
never said mickey was intentionally wrong. I believe he honestly formed his opinion. I just think he is putting too much stock into that Singer may know the proper sequence years after the fact. There are other ways he could have found out that sequence. It doesn't mean he knew it in 2006 or anything about this play.
I see that using this handle you have only been on this forum since 2019. It feels like much longer since you seem to know things from way before that. Perhaps you were here using a different handle? Perhaps not.

But I will say if you are not truly familiar with Singer, perhaps you should go back and read some of his history on this forum. You would see things like a hand written bill of sales for the Newell, on a piece of paper with no company stationary or logo. Just a generic form from the internet with the representative of the dealership and the buyer (Rob) all in the same handwriting. These things matter because that is what credibility is! If nothing else you would get a good laugh from this guy you find amusing.
Now, I am getting a little tired of you taking shots at me. I have been nothing but respectful to you since you came here. What is up with that?