Originally Posted by
redietz
I'm going to answer the one question without really answering it. First of all, I was winging this too much -- I should have not played the interleague games. They have some advantage, but not as much as the NL games.
Second, I have specific historical reasons to bet the NL only, but I'm not going to spell them out. They're not super secret reasons or anything you couldn't figure out on your own, but 98% of bettors aren't aware of certain numbers, so I'll keep my reasoning to myself. But there was some thinking behind it that made sense to me. I had three or four halfway decent reasons, actually, but they were all based on historical league data going back three or four years.
The main idea was that the totals for the NL were too high to begin the season, based on the new DH. Unders went crazy for both leagues, and that forced the totals down. Well, half a run shift is enormous, and eventually the totals shifted down enough to turn the Overs into an advantage.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner tonight. Good week. And that's it for the project.
The only reason I shared this stuff is that bulk betting is just a contextual decision with no real skill or expertise involved, so I didn't give away any aspects of how I do anything. I just paid attention and was patient enough to wait for the right numbers.
We did a similar thing when the college three-point line was moved back a couple of years ago. We targeted the teams that shot the most threes and previously shot the highest percentage of threes, and we went after the Unders involving those teams for about a month. It worked pretty well. But things like these may not come up for a decade or more. You just sniper them when you think you can.
And yeah, I still know nothing about baseball. Seriously.