Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post

What's next? Counting two tables?
Proving my point. Your distain for AP's and players that play and win by the math.

Why wouldn't a player that plays 25, 30, 40 hours a week, counting cards, be able to count down two (or more) tables at once using a simple level 1 count?

There are two parts to this. The first part is the logistics and I clearly said "when conditions are right", something you people always ignore. And as a side note, conditions are worse and worse post-covid. Part of that is just fewer traditional blackjack tables, and part is a concerted effort by the casino industry to eliminate or move low limit players (and tables) to those stadium type arrangements that can have one dealer dealing to 50 or more players, which forces more crowded conditions at the fewer regular tables.

The second part is the actual act. You people want to believe that a player that tracks cards via a simple level 1 count, can't track two separate actions (tables) for a brief period of time until he can determine which is the better opportunity, which is usually only a few rounds, (team spotters track as many as half dozen games at once, looking for the best opportunity). BUT YET, you want to believe all the billion and trillion to 1 nonsense that you believe. You guys are really out there.