Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Ive ignored redietz's comments about false W2Gs until now, but I've just got to try to understand what he's trying to point out here? Why would a casino commit a federal crime by filing false W2G information with a false signer and social security number? Is the casino involved in money laundering?

And what has this got to do with Singer?

I can understand how someone with low tax liability might accept a signer for someone with a high tax liability. And I can understand how someone with offsetting losses can take a signer for someone with no offsetting losses.

But how do you explain or account for someone taking a $1.5-million signer for someone else?

Then, making the Redietz post even more confusing, Singer hasnt even presented a W2G yet so why would you even question a non existent document or even the motivation for a false signer?

Really, it is weird.

Maybe its something Redietz learned in one of his journalism classes?

You know, I was going to spell this out for you, but the hell with it. If you need a seminar, I charge 50K for a three-day weekend.

I didn't question a non-existent document. I warned neophytes off betting against anyone having such a document. And I warned them off before Axel displayed his collection of blank W2Gs.

God almighty, if my neurons bite the dust as fast as Alan's or mickey's or Rob's, I should just slash my wrists now and save myself some grief.
YOu are just playing games like the troll you are. A W2-G don't prove jackshit. Never has. Never will. Anything can be faked. Even a pic of the COO of the casino shaking Rob's hand over the jackpot (The COO was payed off to do it). So why do you think someone would pay off a bet because a W2-G was produced? It's why I don't take bets off the internet. To much trickery bullshit.