Originally Posted by
PositiveVariance
I think the reason that Rob was willing to blatantly lie regarding placing $700k with Bob Nersesian, is he knew if a random person called Nersesian, he couldnt confirm or deny such a claim due to legal consequences. Then if KJ called Nersesian, since they may have had prior business dealings/friendship, Nersesian would verify Singer never sent any money.
Singer would instantly claim KJ was a liar and demand "proof", which of course Nersesian would not provide because if he had in fact received money from singer (which he didn't) he would face legal consequences by disclosing dealings with other clients.
It's amazing the lengths Singer attempts to go to in order to try to get us to believe something he clearly isn't.
He has been doing this for decades. Amazing? Not the word I would use. Sad, pathetic, sick are words that immediately come to mind.
I believe you are mistaken about consequences for the attorney. If asked if he has received a 6 figure escrow regarding a wager on a gambling forum, saying "no" does not violate anything. There is no client or confidentiality to break because he hadn't received that escrow. Now had he received such an escrow, I don't know that he would have confirmed. At that point he might have said, I can't discuss it or can't confirm or deny. But having not received anything, there is no client, nor confidentiality to break.
Reply With Quote