When Weakness Prevails, Show Them The Meaning of Strength

[redietz]

The ditz threatened to shoot mickeycrimm & Rob Singer.

Those are both technically incorrect. I said if mickey made the comment about my late wife to my face, I would either tase him or blow his head off, depending on my mood. That is not the same as "threatening to shoot."

Second, I did not threaten to shoot Rob. I just quoted scripture regarding the sins of the father.

You seem sensitive, coach. Hasn't anyone ever pointed a gun at you with malice? Or fired a warning shot in your direction? You folks have led sheltered lives. I take it not many veterans in this group, either.

Red you now there’s no statute of limitations for homicide.

Not smart to talk about

I'm a pussycat, Seed. I was bad in my youth, but I've gone straight since then, as evidenced by my record. Eighteen arrests and no convictions.

For those wondering, that's a line from Guys and Dolls.

[Treeshade]

Last thing if anyone wants to have a real conversation about gambling let’s talk.

But I’m not having a serious conversation with fakes like Kew or anyone who defends the fake.

Not everyone knows everything it’s impossible. I think this board needs to get away from defending the frauds and let’s have some real discussions.

Let go of Rob and Kew fuck gun trick

[Treeshade]

If anyone wants to know how to commit interblock gaming fraud we can get into it. That’s if MAX says it’s ok

Not that it matters casinos suck dick

[kewlJ]

Remember guys they entire forum is parody no body here is real besides bennett Reeber he’s real

I don't know who bennett reeber is or is in reference too , but I don't think the rest of this statement is correct.

There is a difference between someone like The guy that posts as Rob Singer, who is not real, it is a made up character, of a government agent, ect who became a winning gambler, with the help of progressive betting, stop limits, special less optimal plays, machines talking to him and other such voodoo beliefs and members that are real people and players that us an alias on gambling forums for obvious reason.

You disparaging real players, regardless of them using an alias, and especially accusing them of criminality as you have done for weeks, I think the person could win legal action against you. I will leave it to the attorneys on the forum to weigh in. Now, I am not going to go that route, because I don't want the publicity and attention, but I do think your assumption here is incorrect.

[Treeshade]

Remember guys they entire forum is parody no body here is real besides bennett Reeber he’s real

I don't know who bennett reeber is or is in reference too , but I don't think the rest of this statement is correct.

There is a difference between someone like The guy that posts as Rob Singer, who is not real, it is a made up character, for government agent, ect who became a winning gambler, with the help of progressive betting, stop limits, special less optimal plays, machines talking to him and other such voodoo beliefs and members that are real people and players that us an alias on gambling forums for obvious reason.

You disparaging real players, regardless of them using an alias, and especially accusing them of criminality as you have done for weeks, I think the person could win legal action against you. I will leave it to the attorneys on the forum to weigh in. Now, I am not going to go that route, because I don't want the publicity and attention, but I do think your assumption here is incorrect.

He’s an actor dumb fuck

Secondly there’s zero the law can do to me because I would not comply. I own nothing in my own name so have fun getting one penny from me or even getting me to comply to a summons or whatever.

Anyone who knows me understands this. It’s the luxury my life affords me. I have Fuck you money

Endgame bro it’s all about the endgame

[Treeshade]

Remember guys they entire forum is parody no body here is real besides bennett Reeber he’s real

I don't know who bennett reeber is or is in reference too , but I don't think the rest of this statement is correct.

There is a difference between someone like The guy that posts as Rob Singer, who is not real, it is a made up character, of a government agent, ect who became a winning gambler, with the help of progressive betting, stop limits, special less optimal plays, machines talking to him and other such voodoo beliefs and members that are real people and players that us an alias on gambling forums for obvious reason.

You disparaging real players, regardless of them using an alias, and especially accusing them of criminality as you have done for weeks, I think the person could win legal action against you. I will leave it to the attorneys on the forum to weigh in. Now, I am not going to go that route, because I don't want the publicity and attention, but I do think your assumption here is incorrect.

I don’t follow the laws you pretend that will govern me.

I don’t give a fuck about death or jail or anything you stupid fuck
.

All I care about is taking casinos for every penny, and calling our fakes like you.

I haven’t used my real name in 20 years lol I doubt they could even serve the right guy at this point fuck

[Treeshade]

Remember guys they entire forum is parody no body here is real besides bennett Reeber he’s real

I don't know who bennett reeber is or is in reference too , but I don't think the rest of this statement is correct.

There is a difference between someone like The guy that posts as Rob Singer, who is not real, it is a made up character, of a government agent, ect who became a winning gambler, with the help of progressive betting, stop limits, special less optimal plays, machines talking to him and other such voodoo beliefs and members that are real people and players that us an alias on gambling forums for obvious reason.

You disparaging real players, regardless of them using an alias, and especially accusing them of criminality as you have done for weeks, I think the person could win legal action against you. I will leave it to the attorneys on the forum to weigh in. Now, I am not going to go that route, because I don't want the publicity and attention, but I do think your assumption here is incorrect.

How many real bad guys have you delt with in life ?

Your like the lefty freaks who think by banning guns criminals will stop using them.

I walk into multi million dollar casinos everyday with people paid 100s of thousands of dollars per year to stop me, and I’m supposed to be afraid of a queen like you ? Threatening me with a summons

�� ��������������������������

[Garnabby]

Well now I don't believe that this is true.

Secret VCT codeword, RIP + ...

Garnabby has left the chat as he can't post and delete fast enough.

---> See also: Dearly Departed Sonic the Hedgehog Characters.

https://anagram-solver.net/%20%20%20...0?partial=true


Have to put in the RIP part to get the anagram answers to say something related like, "Dearly departed." Interesting how you mentioned "fast enough", and, then, the word, sonic, appears. Furthermore, as silly as some such answers go on to seem, there's always an explanation for the rest, as well.



"A variety of Sonic characters gathered. Clockwise from top: Doctor Eggman, Rouge the Bat, Shadow the Hedgehog, Knuckles the Echidna, Sonic the Hedgehog, Amy Rose, Miles "Tails" Prower, Cream the Rabbit, Cheese the Chao, and Blaze the Cat."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...hog_characters

Note the Doctor Eggman, listed at the top of the list, and, then, his similarity to my closing line of late when I felt a bit more energetic. Almost a "the Grim Reaper" look to him, which is my username at the numerology forum. Quit posting there after a short spurt of posts, last year around this time. (Threw up one more, a month ago, on the new server, for hellry.)

"I am the Garnabby, I am the William Yung, I am the eggy man. (Gotta love the three triple syllables in these names, at the ends of the phrases)" [333]. [Oh, note the placement of the period, in this case, just where it's, technically and universally speaking, supposed to go, with footnote numbers, and the like.]

--->

***List of massively multiplayer online real-time strategy games.

Present day Mars habitability analogue environments on Earth.

The Portable Atheist: Essential Readings for the Non-Believer.

Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind.

Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays.

https://anagram-solver.net/I%20am%20...)?partial=true

Of course, again, eggy means slightly annoyed. Slightly annoyed with most of the conversations here, especially with sad Seedvalue picking up where Singer left off. I waited for a quiet spot to throw in one more post for the evening.

How's your hockey game coming along? I have pretty much finished with my series of posts from post-772, to post-777. A lot of fun, but, never know how it will turn out. It's not like there's any time to plan any of it out, before. A matter of "faith", in a sense, in the universe, that it will all "just" work out. Especially when emotions run high, as with the stuff of divine vengeance.


P.S. Hey, I think that I will let this post stand, as another part of said series of posts.

[Treeshade]

I really got to go later

[coach belly]

You seem sensitive, coach.

You must be pretty sensitive to detect something like that.

The shooting topic was raised, and I added information,
no feelings or emotion involved...just the facts, mam.

BTW...you definitely threatened to shoot mickey,
and you just lied about threatening to shoot Singer.

That seems to be your thing now,
to lie about what you posted and what you meant.

Seems likely that it always was.

[MisterV]

KJ, as Seedless-rape has made what you claim to be defamatory statements and you've been doxed (your name is known) I believe you have the right to sue.

If you do, your atty will file the action against a "John Doe" as his name is currently not known.

At that time the attorney would present a motion to the court seeking a court order directing Dan Druff and the internet co. behind this board to disclose to you the unknown defendant's internet info. which leads to you discovering his name and mailing address.

Then you amend the complaint to include his real name, serve him, and then "game on."

This isn't the first time I've advised you that you have a potential claim, should you wish to pursue it: I suspect you'll decline here as well due to the expense and the hassle.

But hey, step into the batter's box and swing for the fence, it's up to you.

Me, I'd just block the guy or put him on ignore.

[kewlJ]

BTW...you definitely threatened to shoot mickey,
and you just lied about threatening to shoot Singer.

Rob Singer is not a real person. It is a made up character. The person that posts as Rob Singer, has not done any of the things, including attended the colleges that the Rob Singer character claims. So threatening to shoot Rob Singer is like threatening to shoot James Bond, or Dirty Harry.....it is a character, nothing more

Now mickeycrimm is a real person. I presume that is not his real name, but all the experiences shared by the person posting as mickeycrimm are real experiences of that person. mickeycrimm is just an alias, and most of us fall into that category, although there are a few who use their real and legal names, like Alan and redietz.

Now this goes to my point that if someone threatening to shoot mickeycrimm, is threatening a real person as you are suggesting coach, and I believe is correct, then someone stating false accusations of criminality about a real person using an alias can equally be held responsible.

And by the way, I am not saying redietz threatened to shoot mickeycrimm. I don't remember or have any knowledge of any such thing. I suppose it would also matter as to how it was said.

[MisterV]

Sorry KJ, but you may be wrong about this.

You admit that you know the true name of "Rob Singer," so a threat against "Rob Singer" (Argentino's nom de plume) is a threat against Argentino.

We all know who you mean, and that's what's important.

But don't worry: these baboons only wish to hurl feces at you instead of hurling money at attorneys.

"It don't mean nothin'.

[kewlJ]

KJ, as Seedless-rape has made what you claim to be defamatory statements and you've been doxed (your name is known) I believe you have the right to sue.

If you do, your atty will file the action against a "John Doe" as his name is currently not known.

At that time the attorney would present a motion to the court seeking a court order directing Dan Druff and the internet co. behind this board to disclose to you the unknown defendant's internet info. which leads to you discovering his name and mailing address.

Then you amend the complaint to include his real name, serve him, and then "game on."

This isn't the first time I've advised you that you have a potential claim, should you wish to pursue it: I suspect you'll decline here as well due to the expense and the hassle.

But hey, step into the batter's box and swing for the fence, it's up to you.

Me, I'd just block the guy or put him on ignore.

Thank you MrV. This is exactly what I am thinking. As I said, for me, I can't and wouldn't pursue this, because of attention it would draw.

For anyone that still doesn't understand, in the gambling community, we have people that post as Dan Druff, Wizard of Vegas, and Richard Munchkin. These are all aliases, not the real names of the people using them. But if someone was to accuse any one of these three, using their alias of a crime that the person didn't commit, I believe that person could take legal action, regardless that their real or legal name wasn't used.

[Treeshade]

Going to leave you guys with a play I ran within the last two years

I call it card ghosting others that know about it may call it something else. It’s exploiting a vulnerability in certain player tracking systems. I honestly don’t know of anyone else who’s aware of it. One particular casino group who recently went on a buying spree was particularly vulnerable at one of their new properties.

The play was simple enough create a max offer card first. This particular spot was giving away 400 6 days a week for a certain amount of coin in. Easy to do they had some games I could do this on for less then 500. I work with a very tight group all women. As they blend in pretty good. So I had my team build 8 max offer cards worth a little under 10k per month. This casino had a very strict amount of play that was required to keep offers on for more then 4 days. If you just came in and converted the free play they would kill the card. The amount of play needed to keep the offer on the entire two months was not sustainable. Meaning you could not profit. But there was a way

Card ghosting involves a dummy card in tandem with the card that has the offer. I’m not going to explain every step but essentially you are able to convince the player tracking system that the offer was never redeemed even tho it was. What made this particular play worth so much was the system allowed for the banking of free play without expiration. However under normal circumstances this would not be exploitable because after 4 swipes with no play the casino would kill the card.

This is where the ghosting comes into play. Since the system did not recognize the ghost card it allowed for the perpetual banking of free play lol. So a two month offer essentially becomes an infinity amount or at least to a point someone would notice , or you actually redeemed the cash. So we turned a two month offer into a three month offer downloading and converting 27k per card all in one day at the end of three months. I have no doubt we could have banked much more but our team settled on three Months as the limit.


The ghosting steps should be easy to figure out for those who have a understanding of ripping free play in the past.

This casino fixed their vulnerability so it no longer works but it was pretty fun while it lasted.

[coach belly]

But if someone was to accuse any one of these three, using their alias of a crime that the person didn't commit, I believe that person could take legal action, regardless that their real or legal name wasn't used.

That there is some real doubletalk.

To be clear, are you asserting that I can, or cannot, take legal action against you for falsely accusing me of a crime?

[Treeshade]

KJ, as Seedless-rape has made what you claim to be defamatory statements and you've been doxed (your name is known) I believe you have the right to sue.

If you do, your atty will file the action against a "John Doe" as his name is currently not known.

At that time the attorney would present a motion to the court seeking a court order directing Dan Druff and the internet co. behind this board to disclose to you the unknown defendant's internet info. which leads to you discovering his name and mailing address.

Then you amend the complaint to include his real name, serve him, and then "game on."

This isn't the first time I've advised you that you have a potential claim, should you wish to pursue it: I suspect you'll decline here as well due to the expense and the hassle.

But hey, step into the batter's box and swing for the fence, it's up to you.

Me, I'd just block the guy or put him on ignore.

I’m your huckleberry

Swing motherfucker

[Treeshade]

Who gives a shit about any of your plays. But type away. Lol.

Hopefully no one

[kewlJ]

Sorry KJ, but you may be wrong about this.

You admit that you know the true name of "Rob Singer," so a threat against "Rob Singer" (Argentino's nom de plume) is a threat against Argentino.

Robert Argentino did not do any of the things portrayed by the character Rob Singer. This makes "Rob Singer" a character, no different than Chili Palmer in the "Get Shorty" movies. So if someone says they are going to kill Chili Palmer is that a threat against John Travolta? I don't think so.

By contrast, the person posting as mickeycrimm, or KewlJ or most of the members here are real people, telling of their real experiences. They are just using an alias for obvious reasons. So a threat or accusation against them is a threat or accusation against a real person.

[Treeshade]

KJ, as Seedless-rape has made what you claim to be defamatory statements and you've been doxed (your name is known) I believe you have the right to sue.

If you do, your atty will file the action against a "John Doe" as his name is currently not known.

At that time the attorney would present a motion to the court seeking a court order directing Dan Druff and the internet co. behind this board to disclose to you the unknown defendant's internet info. which leads to you discovering his name and mailing address.

Then you amend the complaint to include his real name, serve him, and then "game on."

This isn't the first time I've advised you that you have a potential claim, should you wish to pursue it: I suspect you'll decline here as well due to the expense and the hassle.

But hey, step into the batter's box and swing for the fence, it's up to you.

Me, I'd just block the guy or put him on ignore.

I’m your huckleberry

Swing motherfucker

What MR V and you fail once again to understand is I don’t give a fuck about your laws or the consequences of your cock sucking wet dreams.

First off kewjaosn said he likes to suck nice cocks multiple times on here

Second I have real life testimony of people that would sign a sworn statement said cock was sucked for money and favors

So sue me lol