---> The Brave Little Toaster: A Bedtime Story For Small Appliances.
https://anagram-solver.net/1%20usual...t?partial=true
There are two sets of 404's, with the 4's for upside-down h's. As well as a 19061 ---> 1961 in there. All of the 0's, and 4's, are mandatory, ie, had to take out those corresponding letters for the above anagram line to appear first in the list. Taking out the corresponding letters for the digits in 1961 didn't prevent the above anagram line from occurring at all. I guess that having to take out a third o as 0 meant having to add the numerals of 1961 around it. Luckily, it was possible.
Gee, I was thinking about it the other day, but, I never thought that I would find an anagram for old, Toaster Boy, Monet. No longer thinks of himself as a toaster. My ass. Ha.
Luckily, this line wasn't too far from the top, and, so, it was a matter of trying to remove the letters that allowed it to rise to the top. A bit of a challenge, sometimes more than others, which makes it fun. Likely the only such toaster line in all of the 20,000,000 or so lines. Almost serendiptous. But, again, it's best to give it at the point of fluency, especially when the 404's start to emerge, as in, "Page not found," sort of a message about being lost in cyberspace. Fits in with PosV expressing that he was stumped.
Something else truly neat is that all of the songs that I thus encountered in my posts, along with a few others, have become a part of "my mix" when I go to play some tunes for tasks such as this, which require a different type and degree of concentration. What I, just, called, a journey of the one. Every one has a unique set numerals related in a unique way.
Interestingly, PosV's reaction to one of my posts was identical to one of the posters, early on, at the numerology site. His username was Elucif969.
---> Believe What You Like: What happened between the Scientologists and the National Association for Mental Health.
https://anagram-solver.net/Garnabbym...s?partial=true
Because it beats the heck out of thinking about burgers & fries, doomsday, ladder ball, and, etc, let alone how to beat the casinos, but, not really or actually giving a crap about the ones who make weirdly unlikely juvenile online claims to be doing just that.
Now I will put up a Kung Fu video or two. I put one up on the end of my final set of posts over at the numerology forum, last year. The one about Caine being told that he may never return to the temple (because he killed the Emperor's son). Over there, I tried to tell them that the only way to make anything of it, the numerology and the like, was not to believe in it, stop sending their money to the such scammers - which didn't go over that well. The one for tonight led me straight to another such video that mentions a Quentin Tarantino connection to the show. Again, funny odd how the best connections, decodes or whatever, happen when not even looking for them. Really and actually is a "small world after all", in more ways than one. Perhaps, another reason that the anagrams-with-gematria can work out so well.
I think that I'll save a few of the such items that didn't quite make it, on their own, for my next post. Some connective bits.
Now for a few more numerals. Earlier on, with the "Pulp Fiction" clip, the Bible verse reversed into my usernumeral at the numerology forum. A usernumeral assigned randomly. I noted that the two numerals added to, (7152 + 2517) = 9669. The difference goes (7152 − 251.7) = 6900.3 = [6900 + (0.9 - 0.6)] ---> 6996.
Where this becomes a lot more difficult is to derive the corresponding counterparts of the digits of the numerals, 6996/9669, namely, 2772/7227, from the numerals, 2517 ---> 7152. It seems that the latter numerals yield the former ones together instead of separately by two different calculations. It took two such calculations to get to the 9669, and 6996, but, each calculation with 2517 ---> 7152 yields both 7227, and 2772. This is true of also my calculation, at the end of this post, about relating the numerals 779, and 780, to the digits of the numeral, 1721, by which 1721 results from each calculation, instead of half of it from 779, and, the other half from 780. [779 = 19*41, and, 780 = 60*13 = (6*10)*13.] I will give the solution, but, let it at this because it takes a few years of such study to begin to confirm and otherwise verify the overall such patterns. There's no substitute for thus parsing it all out.
(6183 + 3816) = 9999 = (7227 + 2772), and, (6281 - 1826) = 4455 = (7227 - 2772). Note that the numerals to do this are formatted as 6x8y, with x = 1, y = 3, or, x = 2, y = 1. With the 2517 ---> 7152 numerals, the format is 7x5y, and, the x stays at 1, and, the y stays at 2. Notice that (7152 − 251.7) = 6900.3 = [6900 + (0.9 - 0.6)] ---> 6996 involved a shift in a decimal position, which is about dividing by 10. And, that the shift with the 6x8y numerals involved reversing, and adding 1 to the y, for the numerals for (6183 + 3816) to make 9999. For the dividing by 10, its about "reversal" by division by 1 with a 0 thus added, or concatenated. There's another very deep bit going on, to do with (3751 − 1573) = (7315 − 5137) = (8316 − 6138) = 2178 = 6*363 = [2 * (9 * 11^2)]. The digits of 2178 go, in another sense, with those of 6183, which appear directly above. Not to worry about it beyond the fact that there are two sets of universal dimensional constants, the fine-structure constants, with 153/173, and 162/186, being of the dimensions that have overlapping numerals. To do with the forms above, 7x5y versus 6x8y. As well, eg, [(37*1) X (1*53)] = 1961.
These numerals interrelate to yield also, 42.
(9669 − 7227) = 2442, and, (6996 − 2772) = 4224, as 42 reflected on itself, and, the reflection of the reflection.
(-19 + 61) = [cbrt(1 + 7) X 21] = 42. As in 1961, which goes with 1721, and, perhaps, as well, with 2171. (1961 - 1721) = 240 ---> 420 = 10*42, and, (2171 - 1961) = 210 = 5*42.
42 = (2.7 × 0.7 repeat × 20) ---> 2772, and, 42 = {[-(6^2) + 9^2] + (-9 + 6)} ---> 6996.
Oh, one other thing to note, from a ghost post, this afternoon.
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
780
779 = [(1 + 7^2) + (2 + 1)^6] ---> 1721;
780 = [(100 + 700) - 2*10] ---> 1721.





Reply With Quote