Originally Posted by
redietz
Mickey's posts don't even make internal sense any more. For example, he's arguing that I should be debunking roulette, but he says the math is so simplistic that any civilian should know that you can't beat roulette. Well, that makes no sense. Why debunk something everyone (according to mickey) should know cannot be beaten?
Mickey argues that I should be debunking roulette because people post about it despite the fact that (outside of coupon use) I have never played roulette. I know nothing about the history of biased wheels or how to spot one. I know nothing about operator collusion or effects. I don't even know the jargon for what numbers are referred to in groups and such. I don't know the posters who are arguing that they can beat roulette. I don't know their history. I don't know their arguments or their counter arguments. But in mickey's mind, I should be debunking roulette.
Mickey has issues. There's no point in engaging him.