Frankly if I was advising Rob, and I have no idea why I would be, but I would advise against what redietz is suggesting, an interview with someone like Dan. I have seen two Rob Singer interviews, one with the late Alan Mendelson and one with Michael Shackleford.
And let's face it, while Alan was a real and credible journalist and interviewer for part of his career (I understand he interviewed Presidents and Queens), later in Alan's career, or his second career, was a little less honest, in promoting products he had been paid to promote. The interview between Alan and Rob felt much more along those lines with Alan asking softball questions that had likely been discussed between the two prior.
The interview with Shackleford was a very typical, person getting caught in their own lies type thing. Shackleford claims he knew that given enough rope, Rob would hang himself, and Rob did when asked to provide some evidence of his claims. Within a couple days Rob had posted pictures of himself inside an RV at a dealership, claiming he bought that RV with the money won.
An interview with someone like Dan Druff would have the same results. Rob would end up further revealing himself. Of course then he would insist on a completely alternative and detached from reality view of how it went down like he has done with the Dan Druff proposed meetup.
People need to separate out that Rob Singer is a made-up character, no different than a character in a book, movie or TV show. And the purpose of this character was to create attention that Robert Argentino needs and craves.
I seriously suggest we all make a Christmas/New Years vow to stop even talking about this made up character and his claims. It is the best way we can help him with his mental illness. And that is what it is. 20+ years of this crap, caught in his own lies time and time again. Throw in all the nastiness. All for some attention.
Reply With Quote