Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
Originally Posted by redietz View Post
W2Gs are evidence that someone has taken tax responsibility for having done something. They are not evidence that the person actually did the something.
I'm not sure I understand.

A W2-G will list the date, the casino, the game number, the amount...what other proof is needed, IF the document is genuine?

Are you thinking maybe his wife won instead of him?
In Nevada there were always guys around that would sign for W2-G jackpots for 10% of the money. These guys didn't own anything and hadn't filed taxes in years nor intended to ever file in the future. They literally didn't give a rats ass. Rob doesn't fit that profile.

What ditz is telling you is that no amount of evidence is sufficient. He's a troll.

What I'm telling you is that mickey crimm doesn't swim in deep enough waters to have any sense of the ubiquity of the practice. His alleged profile of the substitute signers for the bigger amounts is wronger than wrong.

This is what happens when mickey spouts stuff he knows almost nothing about, whcih is actually quite a bit once you get into bigger figures. He demonstrates his general lack of knowledge. Mickey has what amounts to a sliding scale. The bigger the stakes, the less he tends to know or have experience with.

Some people call that willful ignorance, but not me. He is, after all, Mickey "The Truth" Crimm.