Rob Singer quit this forum after his fake "Vegas trip" debacle, which we busted as being phony -- but why?

[kewlJ]

What ditz is telling you is that no amount of evidence is sufficient.

Well a W-2 certainly wouldn't be sufficient. This is a guy (Singer), that printed out a blank bill of sales for an RV from a template on the internet and signed all 3 signatures (buyers and sellers) in the same handwriting. So a W-2 is sufficient? THIS is where past behavior comes into play and what credibility is, mickey. And you are throwing yours away by continuing to support this BS.

Axelwolf posted at WoV a while back that several years ago, he had in his possession a pad of W-2 from a casino. So he could have produced 100 W-2's with any amounts he wanted and they would look real, because the W-2 was real, just the info bogus. So NO, Rob producing a W-2 wouldn't mean much to me.

Now Dan Druff, had a way to verify, or disprove Rob's claim. It didn't involve W-2's, which might or might not be real, or a hand picked person to vouch for anything. But of course Rob couldn't let that happen. End of story. This is just another Singer Rabbit hole.

I finished the thread.

Yes, I saw what PositiveVariance discovered (good job), and I have some comments about that, as well as Rob's "Vegas strip" visit.

First off, I doubt Rob was ever in Vegas. As I mentioned before, he was using a VPN service showing a Vegas location, but that's meaningless. Someone on another continent could show up here as being from "Las Vegas" with the same trick. Fortunately I can tell the difference between VPNs and legit local IPs. While Rob might claim he was using a VPN while also in Vegas, that wouldn't make any sense. He was using a service called "IP Vanish" (or one of its subsidiary services), and no local Vegas internet connections would subscribe to such a thing. In fact, I am familiar with the IPs of the Wifi for most Vegas hotels, and Rob's IP was none of those. Instead, it was that VPN service meant to change his apparent location. Nice try, though.

I think PositiveVariance figured out the screen shot pretty well. Indeed, this was run on a Windows computer. The cursor, the blue upper bar, and the minimize "dash" at the top right gave that all away. The "editing" excuse is garbage. If he needed to edit the screen shot in order to get it down to a size this site would accept for posting, then it wouldn't make a sense to take a picture of the edited photo, as that would induce the same problem all over again (it would again be too big!)

As I mentioned before, and has been pointed out by many others, the stack of bills were fake. Rob is being reckless by posting that he has $700k sitting in his home. This is a public forum, and certain unsavory characters read this place. He is putting himself and his family in danger by making such claims, as some might take it seriously and believe that there's $700k in cash to steal from his house. Many people would kill for that type of money. Pretty dumb, Rob. Your wife would be pissed if she knew. For the record, there's zero chance Rob has $700k sitting in his house, so anyone considering going down and committing a crime for it shouldn't bother. You should be thanking people for pointing out this being a lie, Rob.

In summary:

- Rob did not play $25/credit UX
- Rob did not hit a $1.5m jackpot
- Rob did not tip $20k
- Rob did not come to Vegas two weeks ago to meet with Max, Alan, or anyone
- Rob does not have $700k in his safe
- Rob does not even have tens of thousands in his safe -- the cash was fake

Thank you for playing.