kewlJ can we have a Rob Singer update?

[kewlJ]

No one is saying he can't beat baseball handicapping contests in the long run but no one cares either.

Lots of people on here have interests outside of machines in the gambling world.

If you can't see his arrogance then I'm not sure what to tell you. His constant doubt of claims that aren't anywhere near unbelievable to begin with. His self-promoting. He tends to avoid questions he can't answer.

He consistently twists everything people say into some strawman.

If he is the contest specialist like he claims and you believe, then the question remains - why didn't he clean up fantasy sports when it was ripe? He then comes up with something unrelated which is yet another strawman. Pathetic.

I used to find him ok but either he has gotten worse or I have come to notice his broken record approach.

If he wants to be respected he should likely just stick to other forums where people are nicer

Can you give me an example of his "constantly" doubting claims that aren't anywhere near unbelievable? Most of the claims he doubts are by Singer and Mdawg and as far as I am concerned, almost all claims by these two have been way more than proven unbelievable. To the point that if one of them says the sky is blue, it probably isn't.

I think there are two things that come into play here with this sudden attacking of Redietz. One is his recent statements that math can't be a part of winning sports betting. As I have said, I think he is wrong on that. I attribute that to he is an old school sports handicapper, looking at everything from player matchups to strength of schedule to any info he can find in determining his picks and less about math. He is going by what has worked for him. Whatever the reasoning...he is wrong. Big deal.

The second thing going on and it is a much bigger thing is that some here have decided they don't like him because of things that have nothing to do with gambling or his sports betting picks or history. Redietz is a liberal on two forums here and GF, dominated by conservatives, including some far right conspiracy theory "dudes". Now I know I am talking to the wrong person, because you are not one of those, but these guys, break it down to teams regarding politics, or lifestyle or any number of other damn things that they don't like and agree with and then they demonize everything about that person. It happens with me every day and I see that with redietz as well. They dont like his politics so they set out to demonize him on everything, including his sports betting history. Imagine if I started finding mickeycrimm not credible concerning gambling topics, simply because his political views are extreme.

As I said I just don't see anything that warrants the attack redietz is under. As a matter of fact, in addition to that he has revealed exactly who he is right down to where he lives in East Bubblefuck (<- ), (I only wish he understood why other AP's cant do that), redietz also tells anyone that questions his claims of 3rd place here, or 4th place in this contest, exactly where they can go to see that for themselves. I have never bothered to, but anyone that wants to can.

Now again, is he leaving out the contests that he isn't doing too well in? I am quite sure he is. Again, just like many AP's that share when they hit a big win, but say nothing when they don't. That is why I have tried to share both winning and losing.

So again, I just don't see what the problem is?

Flat out question: Do you accountinQuestion, not believe redietz has made a living doing what he claims, playing all these contests and placing some "future type wagers" that he can then hedge on later? (you can also hedge on the contests). If he has not met that bar for you, I guess that is your call, but I don't believe that is the case with most of these guys. Singer has labeled redietz, "weird" and "a Martian" because of things completely unrelated to anything redietz claims and these other guys are feeding off that nonsense.