Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
Fomented and led an insurrection to destroy democracy: 'nuf said.
Joe Biden and only Joe Biden will make the decision whether Trump is prosecuted or not. The Special Counsel will make recommendations to Garland but Garland won't make a move without Biden ordering it.

I already told you about Nancy Pelosi turning down Trumps offer to send in the Guard. And how she ordered the capitol police, a very large force, not to have a big presence. This is all going to be exposed by the next Congress.

Garland and the FBI have something else to worry about. And it's a biggie. Did the FBI foment a riot? Or attempt to foment a riot? Do you remember Ray Epps. The guy on film telling people around him that they "need to go into the Capitol." DOJ charged hundreds with crimes. Why was Ray Epps, who was caught on film more than once fomenting crimes, never charged?

I don't know if you watched any of the last time FBI Direction Wray testified before Congress. If you've ever watched this guy there is never any testimony from him. It's all "I can't talk about ongoing investigations" or "Again I have to be very careful about what I say." Never any meat and potatoes from that guy.

But watch this 1 minute video especially at the end. This one congressman exposed Wray and the FBI. If the FBI did not have undercover operatives in the crowd dressed as Trump supporters Wray would have no reason to avoid answering NO. But he couldn't do it. And watch him stumble on his words at the end when he tries to avert suspicion that the FBI had operatives in the crowd. Was Ray Epps one of those operatives? Did the FBI foment a riot.



You are a lawyer, V. Defense has a right to point fingers at others. Do you think DOJ can successfully prosecute Trump without exposing the FBI agents, reportedly 8 agents, that were in the crowd possibly fomenting a riot?

The big question?

IF THE FBI KNEW THERE WAS GOING TO BE A RIOT/INSURRECTION WHY DIDN'T THEY STOP IT?
The only time he stammers is when mr political partisan interrupts him where he can't finish what he is saying. As far as I can tell he is going off FBI policy where they do not confirm or deny confidential sources. This is pretty standard. Say you have a crazy story but don't want to tell who the character is. If you don't want people to know but told them story X, then you'll refuse to let them work off process of elimination. Same concept with the FBI.

Also I looked earlier about this Pelosi and holding the guards back. Literally I can find no evidence about it and given how threatening these insurrectionists were to Democratic lawmakers it makes very little SENSE she would have done this.

I've seen both of you and Monet go on about how none of the antifa were prosecuted (your word - not mine) I would like to see how many of these people were caught and let loose. It sure as fuck wasn't the cops so it must have been the prosecutors. Where are these arrests for the looting and such? Just because the antifa guys were smarter about it (AVOIDING the cops when they were distracted) doesn't mean some great big conspiracy. If these Trump people had turned off their cellphones and wore masks I bet far fewer would have been caught. Where are these antifa types being arrested and let off assuming actual evidence is there?