Originally Posted by redietz View Post
This kind of discussion demonstrates how little handle the posters here have on what's been done in the past historically and by individuals, what's been achieved by whom, what's considered possible and probable, and how few people do what.

There is an entire culture of sports betting with a long history of who did what and you are not part of it or even dipping your toes in it. You have no knowledge of it.

So why act as if you know what you're talking about? It's not as if the "AP" culture presented on forums is some big, established culture with its own verified, documented history. The "AP" culture is very small compared to the sports betting culture. The "AP" culture has fewer verifiable facts, of course. With no third parties keeping actual tabs on people's claims. The "AP" presentation is all fairy tales and anonymous narratives

As far as sports betting goes, why act as if you know what you're talking about? Because you "know" a handful of bettors? Because you know a little math?
Easy 1K for ya....tick....tock....tick....tock. Just put up the quote where I said the dead number thing was a new angle....tick....tock....tick....tock. You can pay your tax bill with the money....tick....tock....tick....tock. I'm waiting....tick....tock....tick....tock....