Originally Posted by
smurgerburger
JBJBs evidence can be explained in various ways. Most charitably that KJ was at one time (or however many updates he has) actually counting and got databased. So? Would that actually corroborate his career?
But it also is perfectly possible someone who reported to OSN simply mistakenly believed that person was KJ. Errors like that happen all the time. After all how would the reporter even know that counter was KJ?
Conspiracy theory people crack me up. They do things backwards. They make up their mind and form their (conspiracy) theory based on some bias,
before they see the evidence. Then when the evidence doesn't match their "theory" they are left trying to explain away the evidence.
They are unwilling to see what they don't want to see.
But carry on.
