How long FraudJ would take to engage in discussion with MDawg despite claiming he would not. How high are you right now?Originally Posted by MisterV
On what?Originally Posted by Ray FinkleCan someone give me the over/under on this please....Originally Posted by kewlJ
The odds that the dawg will prove he bought a mansion are infinitely less than the odds that KJ oiled his surf board.
Just sayin;.
I just assumed the "in a wreck...get a check" wasn't meant literally. Just a holdover of a 10+ year gingle. It is 2023. I just assumed all 6 figure transactions are done by electronic transfer now. Why would someone hand someone a paper check that can be lost or stolen in 5 minutes, for 100's of thousands of dollars in 2023?Originally Posted by AxelWolf
BUT, I don't really know or have a ton of experiences with this. I can only speak to my own experiences, and I have been involved with a total of 6 transactions over 100k, this settlement and five real estate transactions and funds were transferred electronically in every case both in and out. No paper checks. No suitcases full of cash.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
You know what. My partner did get a check from a casino for 6 figures, so there is that. I stand sort of corrected although technically that wasn't me. But I am aware of a transaction for 6 figures that occurred by check.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Originally Posted by MisterV
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder + Bill Yung + 1HitWonder ---> GOTTLOB1 = Praise to God!
Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/2023/08/blog-post.html
Why do you ask?Originally Posted by MaxPen
I'm not KJ's keeper, I merely tend to side with him over his detractors.
Whether I really believe him or not is irrelevant to a pot stirrer such as myself, eh?
What, Me Worry?
I do believe it is now unanimous how many people know kew to be a lying sack of shit. Clueless. He never even looked over how money transfers are done before he fabricated this ever-changing story, and his stupidity on the subject further proves how he's never been the recipient of more than a few hundred bucks.Originally Posted by kewlJ
Speak for yourself, Robert: I do not *yet* subscribe to that belief.
I give KJ leeway due to what I consider years of informative black jact info posts, which to a non-AP, non-blackjack player such as myself seemed genuine enough.
What, Me Worry?
He's backed himself into a worse lie should have stuck with the ACH story. When I have time I'll post more. Meantime, he had better continue to "study up" on what he's lying about to make his latest version of the story more credible.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
His blackjack posts weren't bad. I feel they were based on generally solid info but a few things were just too much. Had he just stuck with his basic story and dispensed reasonable bj info then life on the forums would have continued on for him. His compulsive lying/need for attention is what did him in. To this day his will bring this stuff up suggesting it is true which is just an insult to the people on here who happen to not be as retarded as Kewl and see through his nonsense.Originally Posted by MisterV
If someone moved to LV thinking they were going to count cards they're likely going to be fucked.
Apparently Zenking has pulled it off but someone suggested he has only saved ~20k a year?
Kewl suggested Southpoint broke his arm in a backrooming.
He has suggested the existence of rigged shufflers and all off the shelf shuffers having this same capability. This is actually huge if you were to believe him.
He has suggested people win 100k off $50 freeplay.
All these things could possibly influence some wannabe gambler type to go off in the wrong direction contrary to Kewls stated purpose otherwise.
Then on top of it all he attacks the posters here as if there is something wrong with *THEM* for pointing out that he a big time fraud. Possibly a complete and total fraud but no one knows.
I have 0 sympathy for the guy/girl.
FWIW I deal with a fair amount of bank transfers. I looked back several months and not only do I not see any ACH transfers post on a weekend, but neither do any inter-bank account transfers. My bank is Wells Fargo so it's possible other banks may post internal transfers on a Saturday, but mine does not.
The first version of UNKewLyingJ’s story was that the settlement for his fictional lawsuit came via a standard business ACH transfer. He stated that it arrived after midnight, early Saturday morning, because the only sort of ACH transfer he was familiar with came from social security disability, and social security transfers do arrive after midnight. He’s mentally ill and that sort of thing is all he knows about, which is why he has posted in the past about SSI.
He spent some time trying to argue that social security payments do land on Saturdays, but gave up when he realized that this wasn’t the case.
But the fact remains that standard business ACH transfers cannot land in the middle of the night. The system for ACH transfers shuts down at 3:30pm PST.
ACHs also can never land on non-banking days, like the Saturday he claimed that his settlement ACH posted.
When he realized this, he changed his story to try fit in with his realization that ACHs can’t land in the middle of the night or on a Saturday, to that “it was not an ACH” but an external bank transfer – meaning a direct transfer from one bank account to another, not realizing that such a transfer too is limited in scope and involves the ability to access the linked account before the bank will allow its linking.
He made up this second version of the story to try to explain how the transfer could have happened outside of normal ACH hours.
He probably should have given up then, but feeling cornered, he made up a third version of his story, which is that his attorney opened a special account at his bank and does this for all his clients, to do an external bank transfer directly to UNKewLying J’s bank account.
But just as important to disproving his lie, is that no attorney would do such a thing, and no client especially not one as paranoid as UNKewLying, would allow it.
First off, by cornering himself into this version of the story – that the attorney created a regular account at the bank and used it to make a regular external transfer from that account to UnKewlJ’s – UnKewlLyingJ is committed to a story where the attorney has no special tools no special processing account to send the money, just has to rely on whatever is available to anyone else who creates a bank account and wants to send money to an external account.
Again, an external account just means – an account not under the name of the sender, whether at the same or different bank.
The fact of the matter is, to do this, you’d have to link your bank account to the external bank account, which will allow both transfers to and withdrawals from the linked account. No attorney is going to do that – it creates potential liability. And as well, the way UNKewlJ told the story, this account was created weeks before the money was even sent to UNKewlJ, meaning that for all that time the attorney’s account would have been open to withdrawing money from UNKewlJ’s account.
No attorney would do something like that.
And even in a fantasy world where an attorney would go around creating and linking newly created accounts with his clients leaving himself open to potential liability for being able to all that time withdraw money from his clients’ accounts and even, with some banks, view all transactions his clients were making in the external accounts, still, a transfer to an external bank account has to have someone logged into the account to make the transfer, and UNKewlJ is implying that this attorney was sitting around all day long doing nothing, and then decided, sometime after midnight, to push the button and send the transfer. And all that is notwithstanding that fact that once midnight Friday passed, we were into a non-banking day - Saturday - and even inter-bank transfers usually will not happen (until Monday).
UNKewlJ can’t even tell us what bank this happened at or describe the process whereby his account was linked to the attorney’s “temporary” account, because – it never happened. There is a process to link the accounts and it cannot happen without UNKewlJ’s cooperation. He never described such a process, because it never happened.
Give it enough time though, allow this liar to “study up” some more on the internet, and we might get a fourth version of this story, that includes details about what UNKewLyingJ had to do to connect his account with his attorney’s. And after further research, he might come up with the name of the bank that will allow this sort of transfer, not all of them will. And maybe some nonsense about how his attorney assured him that he would use the link only to send him money, not withdraw.
Last edited by MDawg; 09-23-2023 at 09:52 AM.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
If you don't want to read all of that, just stick to the executive summary,
and further proof that he's feeling cornered and humiliated as he is called on his contradictory nonsense, is the return of the gratuitous racism. What do you expect though from someone whose own family threw him out such that he ended up growing up gutter educated, on the streets. He lies just as often as he breathes.Originally Posted by MaxPen
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
I simply am not going to waste hours on this with you today. Almost everything you posted is made up or involves details that aren't true. The story didn't change to include a bank account that my attorney set up. I shared that months ago as I was going through it. It was one of many details that, was new to me as I had no idea how these things work. It was an account for the sole purpose of receiving the settlement money and holding it while any final details were worked out and then disbursing the money at which time the account was closed. And that is exactly what happened. Maybe when I have too much free time I will go back and find where I shared this months ago as I was going through it.
And by the way, this holding account was specifically set up at the same bank that I would be having my portion of the money sent to. I was asked what bank I wanted to use. I think one of the reasons for this was for transparency. That I would be able to look at this account, view transactions and see where all moneys were going. Like most things in this case, this was new to me, so I have no idea if handling things this way was unusual or specific to my attorney or common. MrV, Regnis, or any other attorney familiar with settlements want to weight in? Are you familiar with or heard of disbursements being handled like this?
And no Mdawg, you asswipe, I will not reveal my bank to you.This is the second time someone on this forum suggests I show banking information, the first being a screenshot of my account. Seems to be some people completely clueless about the concept of anonymous forums.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
This is like watching a drowning person reaching for a life preserver that's 10 arm lengths away.Originally Posted by kewlJI simply am not going to waste hours on this with you today. Almost everything you posted is made up or involves details that aren't true. The story didn't change to include a bank account that my attorney set up. I shared that months ago as I was going through it. It was one of many details that, was new to me as I had no idea how these things work. It was an account for the sole purpose of receiving the settlement money and holding it while any final details were worked out and then disbursing the money at which time the account was closed. And that is exactly what happened. Maybe when I have too much free time I will go back and find where I shared this months ago as I was going through it.
And by the way, this holding account was specifically set up at the same bank that I would be having my portion of the money sent to. I was asked what bank I wanted to use. I think one of the reasons for this was for transparency. That I would be able to look at this account, view transactions and see where all moneys were going. Like most things in this case, this was new to me, so I have no idea if handling things this way was unusual or specific to my attorney or common. MrV, Regnis, or any other attorney familiar with settlements want to weight in? Are you familiar with or heard of disbursements being handled like this?
And no Mdawg, you asswipe, I will not reveal my bank to you.
At this point Kewl is far worse than Tasha ever was. Dan, I think you know what needs to be done.
KewlJ I think it's about time you try your tough guy act again.
O, ye of llittle faith ...
KJ, when I was practicing law I typically had any settlement funds sent by check to my office by the insurance company, made payable to both the client and I.
I deposited the money in my trust account and disbursed them at the conclusion of the case by check after the client reviewed and signed off on a completed disbursement sheet.
Sometimes, if the amount warranted it, I set up a separate account so that the interest earned would go to the client and not to the bar, as otherwise the interest on the money in attorney's trust accounts went to the state bar to help fund it; it could be that this is what your attorney did.
Not sure how I'd handle it in these Modern Times, me being a Luddite and all.
One question: was the account the attorney set up in both his and your name, or yours only?
Last edited by MisterV; 09-23-2023 at 11:00 AM.
What, Me Worry?
Appreciate you weighing in MrV. Yeah it is a different time as far as technology and money transfer. That is why I was surprised to hear some people talk about paper checks and referencing the in a wreck...get a check commercials.
No, no, this temp account was not in my name. There was reference to my case but the account was really owned and controlled by the law firm. I didn't open it. I didn't close it.
I think it was all about transparency. Doing it in this manner the client can see where the funds are and where funds are going every step of the way.
I didn't really ask questions about why this is why that. I was just satisfied and impressed as to how it was handled.
If I am being honest, late in the afternoon or early evening when I checked my account and didn't see the funds, I wondered where it was. But just figured the bank handles that however it is they handle that and it would show up.
It is a much smaller scale but when I make my credit card payment each month which occurs automstically, the day that the money moves between checking and credit card at sane bank, it will show as "processing" for several hours before the amounts in each account change. I assumed something similar with this transaction between accounts at the same bank.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Kew, you're wasting your time....although what else is there to do for such a lowlife. Everything mdawg said about how transfers occur is correct. And almost all of what you claimed about them is fabricated. The audience can easily tell when you're doing the kj shuffle these days. And it ain't pretty.Originally Posted by kewlJ
Face it--you're a loser. You are the joke.
Another TWO tells that establish that UNKewlJ lied about all this is how he was going on and on about how the casino was the Plaintiff in all of this. No, not just the "confusion" over the difference between plaintiff and defendant, but that even after signing the settlement agreement,
he was talking about Plaintiff and Defendant. Now that we know that there never was any lawsuit, the settlement agreement would not even have used the terms plaintiff or defendant because those terms refer to filed actions. A settlement agreement reached without any lawsuit would simply have referred to the parties by name, perhaps with some sort of abbreviations used to refer to each side, such as maybe Party A or Party B. In any case, he would have seen those terms so often in the settlement agreement (and never any reference to plaintiff or defendant) on so many pages that it would not have even occurred to him to refer to anyone as plaintiff or defendant because such terms would have no meaning in his matter, he would never have heard or seen such terms to begin with.Originally Posted by kewlJ
And then yet another discrepancy is that he referred to the settlement funds being placed into an "escrow" account, which is the way we attorneys handle this sort of thing. We're not supposed to commingle our own funds with settlement funds. But by going through this fictional method UNKewlJ made up to try to explain how he got the funds after midnight, on a Saturday no less, the attorney would have immediately had access to UnKewlJ's own bank account, their accounts would have been linked, which even the appearance of such a thing would create possible impropriety.
And UNKewlJ still hasn't come up with any explanation of the process by which his account was linked with the attorney's, or how he was allowed access to this account to, as he put it,
Originally Posted by kewlJand of course doesn’t realize that what he is describing is complete access to this “temporary” account the attorney created, which would mean then that UNKewlJ could log in and just transfer every nickel in the account to his own, and then walk off.Originally Posted by kewlJ
Again, no attorney would allow that. The process UNKewlJ describes is of linking an account to another – that is the only way for him to be able to view the “transactions” in the “temporary” account, and for the attorney to be able to transfer funds to UNKewlJ’s linked account. Again, this would allow the attorney, and also, according to the way UNKewlJ is now describing it, UNKewlJ himself, to withdraw funds in either direction. Just no way any attorney would set something like that up.
When accounts are linked for inter-bank transfers, this allows transfers to and withdrawals from the linked account - that is the way it works, there is no special way to link accounts to allow only a one way transfer. The very linkage of UNKewlJ's account with the attorney's would create commingling, and violate State Bar guidelines for this sort of thing.
But, again, the fact that he continued to talk about plaintiff and defendant when those terms would have no applicability to a case where there was no lawsuit, and the fact that he was talking about an “escrow” account for the money versus the latest version of how he claims all this happened – transfer to an account where he had full access! shows you how convoluted and contradictory his lie has become.
An escrow account by definition is something where neither party has full access, and a third party controls the funds for disbursement. By using the word “escrow” UNKewlJ would have been repeating what the attorney told him, and the end process he describes is not any sort of escrow.
What’s clear is that he made up the whole thing, after having researched or heard about other such matters and lawsuits, and continues to flounder with ridiculous contradictory versions of the same story.
Try again, UNKewlJ! You should have kept your mouth shut we would have thought you were a horse and let you through.Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Last edited by MDawg; 09-23-2023 at 11:41 AM.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.
MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
