Originally Posted by Darkoz View Post
Originally Posted by DGenBen View Post
Interesting,

I’ve heard of some indian casinos refusing to pay & getting away with it, when the jackpot is on someone else's card.

I also recall a couple of stories about regulated casinos, outside of NV but I don’t recall where, maybe Maryland or Colorado refusing to pay jackpots when someone self excluded then came back in anyway & won, and If I recall I think they got away with it too.
Self excluded is different.

It's usually codified in gambling statutes and regulations that jackpots won by a self-excluded person is forfeit.

This is because the payment itself would feed into the addiction. At any rate, the casino is within the law in those circumstances, in fact would generally violate the law by performing payout
obviously they should pay regardless. But if I'm getting the story correctly, it sounds like he had been in there multiple times and hit jackpots after he was 86ed? If so, I think that makes it a situation where he could claim the 86ing was lifted or void.