Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Fuck off Mission. I am not going to keep having this same discussion with you every time you perceive that I have insulted your BF Shackleford, which I didn't, if you knew how to read.

This bullshit that Mdawg is not hurting anyone, nor violating rules is nothing but bullshit. Shacklefords mission statement when he started the forum was to help people become better and better informed gamblers. NOTHING about this asshole being allowed to make claims on almost a daily basis that defy the mathematic of gambling helps anyone.

That Mdawg skirts the rules is no reason to say oh well. His intent and agenda from Day 1 was to make a mockery of WoV and Shackleford. You don't celebrate that by saying oh well, if you don't like it don't read it. Fuck, by that reasoning, if you don't like what I have to say don't read it.

Fact is Michael Shackleford is a highly respected gambling math expert. A reputation he has earned. So someone visiting the forum that still bares his name and likeness that he still basically runs, that reads this voodoo bullshit that defies the math, what are they to think? They saw it on Wizards forum, it must be legit. Almost like an endorsement. Which is basically what Mdawg runs around on other forums saying...."wizard endorsed".
As horny as the thought of me having a boyfriend, and therefore being interested in guys, might make you---it ain't gonna happen, brother! Dreaming is free, though. I'm not the thought police. I don't care what you jack off to as long as I don't have to know about it.

Yes; we provide information that can help make people more informed gamblers. That doesn't mean that every word on the forums has to be devoted to doing that. I'm willing, though often proven wrong, to give your average person enough credit for intelligence to know what is or isn't valid. That's not to say MDawg has said anything purely wrong lately. For one, I don't know that I've ever seen him make a mathematical claim of any kind. Secondly, I don't really read his thread, as I have already mentioned.

I like arguing. I can block you if you really want me to, but I have no idea why I would. If I didn't like talking with you, rest assured, I would not do so. Especially here.

If someone reading the forum wants to assume that every word posted by random handles is personally endorsed by Mike, then they are free to believe that. My suggestion to them would be to be less of a retard.