GAMBLER: SECRETS OF A LIFE AT RISK

[AxelWolf]

According to redietz he worked the 2002 NFL season for Walters, about 6 months. But he has never said what his job description was.

So as far as we know he was scrubbin' toilets to get his foot in the door.

I wish. I was actually shining shoes. Shining shoes is a step down from scrubbing toilets because you can't wear gloves while shining shoes and handling other people's feet. The only other guy I knew who had the same status as me was named Al. Said he had moved to LV from Chicago.

It turns out, I was the top college football profit handicapper in The McCusker Report three of the final five years it published. Not nearly good enough for latrine duty. Now had I finished tops in profit FOUR out of five, maybe I would have gotten the toilet gig. Had I managed a five-year sweep of the top college football profit rankings, then it's possible that I would have qualified for chauffeur, but the odds against that were very long.

I love shining shoes. Reminds me of getting ready for early Sunday church service under the tutelage of my dad. I shined my shoes Saturday so they'd be ready.

FYI. I'm certain Rob Singer was a Top writer for Gaming Today for many years(that was a huge gambling magazine at one time). He has a book or two published. He has been interviewed and written about by known award-winning, presidential meeting journalists and many more accolades under his belt.

The only thing I can find on The McCusker Report is something about Alzheimer's. Good length we can follow I'm sure you probably posted them before but it's been a while.

[mickeycrimm]

Sports bettor, Bob Dietz, has asserted that Walter's chapters on strategy have a faulty context. That things were left out. And that Walter's is actually wrong about some things. And per the usual, Dietz didn't explain what was wrong or left out.

So the question is....Is Bob Dietz right, or Billy Walters right? In the book Walters says there is more than one way to handicap. I don't know that redietz is that flexible.

One thing we know for sure redietz has stated in no uncertain terms that football games cannot be fully handicapped by mathematical models. Walters fully handicaps with mathematical models.

Redietz says that EV can't be calculated. Walters measures EV.

That which way to bet against the spread is a matter of opinion. Walter's does not use opinions, just math.

I think what they have is a contrast in styles. By criticizing Walters like he is, Dietz is asserting himself to be a better handicapper than Walters. Is the mouse flipping off the elephant?

I've done a lot of googling. I can't find another negative critique of Walter's strategy. And I can't find anything about a book club meeting where they debunk Walter's strategy. Redietz has led us to believe the press was there but I've googled to hell and back and can't find a single story. And why is Deitz keeping the name of the co-host under wraps if it was a public meeting?

This controversy deserves attention by the real sports betting press. A lot of people need to weigh in. Some of these people doing podcasts need to be informed.