Originally Posted by Spike View Post
Originally Posted by unowme View Post
Bayesian inference might allow APs to adjust their play based on observation of outcomes by uncovering a lack of true randomness in the game itself or by overcoming a lack of knowledge on the inner workings of the game.

Now, is Spikes 'outcome-based method' steeped in a deep understanding of this alternative math? Unlikely. But that's not to say there might not be some basis for his outcome-based approach.
'Might allow AP's to adjust their play based on observation of outcomes' is the best analysis of what I do I've seen in a long time. This is why I come to these places because once in awhile an insight like this comes along.
If you've held kew speechless with that then you're doing something right. Especially to the nutbag who started this thread in order that he could make it all about himself.

But I'd like to hear more.