Originally Posted by Spike View Post
"His computer guys track every conceivable statistic and built models based on statistics going back to 1974."

He does what I do, he gathers information and makes educated guesses. Except my information only goes back a few spins but it's the same thing. He's using past outcomes to make guesses about future outcomes. Works if you know how to do it.
And they can show the math based on previous statistics and come out with an expected value. Feel free to show us your mathie math math. If you cannot do it yourself, and we know you can't, feel free to give it to Mike and I'm sure he would be glad to run the numbers.

You just made up the 80% hit rate, it's something you pulled out of your ass. I know for a fact you couldn't even figure out what percentage an 80% hit rate would give you.

Actually, I take that back, I think originally you were trying to indicate that you won/win 80% of your sessions. You didn't know how to articulate that to everyone, so to avoid looking like an idiot, you just went with the 80% hit rate. I'm fairly certain that you didn't realize there's a big difference between winning 80% of your sessions VS having an 80% hit rate.

I have it on very good authority, you couldn't even figure out what percentage an 80% hit rate would give you.

That's what's f****** you up really bad with your attempts at trying to convince everybody that you can beat roulette, you are a complete mathtard who barely even knows math, math-related/gambling-related terms. I've seen your attempts at trying to put into your own words what those crazies on gambling forums and people from the past have said. The problem is... some of those guys are actually very good at math and understand how to properly insert the correct gambling/math terms that actually make it seem somewhat believable and confusing enough to possibly sound legit/logical.