Originally Posted by redietz View Post
The above analysis is a waste of reading time. It's comical.

You'd have to define "sports pick tournament player" -- LOL -- as if all sports are lumped together. As if you know whether the results someone got in a prior contest were their selections as opposed to someone else's. Impossible to tell. Impossible to tell who is bearding whom. Impossible to tell, as in poker, who is colluding and part of the same competing organism, in a sense. Impossible to tell how many entries are under one aegis. In old poker lingo, hard to tell how many horses are from one stable.

It's stupid to go through exercises like this. Serves zero purpose except one. It gives some anonymous dingbats the feeling that they know what they are talking about and gives them some ridiculous, totally inappropriate chance to work out some first-grade masturbatory math in service of pretending they have a handle on gambling.

Why would anyone with zero experience decide they have a grasp of things they know nothing about? It's just flat-out silly. Like using the math of random events and trying to apply it to non-random events. That's fundamental moron territory.
Lol that is another thing you do ! King of the strawmen. In addition to "you haven't done your research." "if you haven't done your research then I'm not going to waste my time" "contact so and so" "travel 1000 miles where someone is filming me yabber on with their phone. NO QUESTION OFF-LIMITS"

Doofus I never anything about knowing who does what or who is colluding and such. What are you even going on about. I'm just trying to have a discussion about sports picking tournaments and strike up a sincere thread of discussion if anyone has thoughts that can actually generalize. Not some one trick pony that is Redietz.

"It serves zero purpose except one". Redietz, my dear genius, did it never occur to you that calculating how much money you make whether in absolutely or hourly terms is something that uhhm yanno maybe consider?

Epic you can't even tell me where my estimations are off. They're likely pretty close when taking the effects of collusion out. Which I'm not sure is a thing for sure but it kinda seems like maybe it could be. Definitely could be in certain spots during pay jumps. Not sure how that plays out overall.

Too bad your lack of credibility is so well deserved. Was hoping you had some input.