Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
KJ, I know you believe you are not required to prove anything to anybody: got it.

But...perhaps you could agree to meet briefly with Dan Druff for the limited purpose of having him then report to the forum that "I met KJ, and here is what he looks like..."

Of course it won't shut up the haters, but it will make them look like idiots.
It really does rub me the wrong way, that I should have to prove anything. It is a bad precedent. If a forum is going to start requiring that of members, don't expect too many AP's to participate.

BUT, that said, I did basically propose what you are asking just 2 days ago. Not a peep from Mdawg on the proposal.

Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Mdog, You like to set up these challenges that favor you and set terms you know that no one will meet, ala Rob Singer, who you stole much of your troll activities from. Here is a deal for you that is fair.

You release Shackleford from the NDA, allow him to say what he saw, nothing identifying and answer questions, including questions from me, just so that you don't write the statement that he says, and I will invite Dan Druff to my home, meet him in the lobby, and walk him up to my condo. I will even log onto my bank account from my computer and he will be able to see the deposit that was made back in June.

That should answer all questions and solve everything once and for all. You game? I am taking a risk, because you might be able to pay Shackleford to lie. I am trusting he wouldn't accept that.