Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
Lol triggered.

"thrived" Perhaps. I guess spreading across the globe means they thrived but I don't think you would have wanted to live their life while they were 'thriving' but I can give you that. Expanded all over the globe but how long did that take to do? It is all about the timescales. If I had to guess many people starved back then but it was all thriving.

All these talking point muppets like Crimm who can't think for themselves love to compare things that lasted time-frames many magnitudes different.

I'm not sure how I'm a nazi for expressing wildly agreed upon science? Old shit for brains aka noted anthropologist Crimm says I must be.

I'm not an expert - far from it. I am quite an expert in climate change relative to the regular posters on here but I would never call myself that in a vacuum.

I started watching a youtube guy the other day where a guy picked apart an "engineer" who had a youtube video. The "engineer" was literally reading from a website that made by an organization that is pro CO2 and just full of nonsense. That guy was a real experts. I don't memorize factoids. I'm far from it but I do follow this stuff outside of msm.

Crimm, since you're not self-perceptive enough let me lay it out. This is another application of the universal excuse. I forget what all I called it when arguing wtih you previously. It is what you always fall back on.

The reasoning is something similar happened in the past therefore what is happening now doesn't matter. It comes from people who can't or won't question the views they already have so they apply the universal excuse. In this case it is 'well the weather has changed in the past and we were ok'.

Crimm still impaled so deep on Trump's dick he can't dislodge his tongue from the guy's asshole. Instead of "someone did something similar in the past so therefore it is ok" he is using a "because the temperature changed in the past then it is ok". It doesn't matter how compareable things are - that is THE argument.
Definitions from Oxford Languages
fa·nat·ic
/fəˈnadik/
noun
noun: fanatic; plural noun: fanatics

a person filled with excessive and single-minded zeal, especially for an extreme religious, political, or environmental cause.

"religious fanatics" "climate fanatics"

Similar:
zealot
extremist
militant
dogmatist
devotee
sectarian
bigot